The D Programming Language - Digitalmars-d-bugs

January 2010 Archives by thread

• Messages sorted by: [ subject ] [ author ] [ date ]
• More info on this list...

Starting: Fri Jan 1 07:00:18 PST 2010
Ending: Sun Jan 31 17:14:50 PST 2010
Messages: 436

• [Issue 3453] Linking order affects proper execution   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3662] New: Wrong compile error within struct constructor and C-style initializer   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3663] New: struct forward reference regresssion   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3663] struct forward reference regresssion   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3663] struct forward reference regresssion   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3663] struct forward reference regresssion   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3541] Add -oq to dmd (use fully qualified module name as object filename)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3615] returning .idup of local static array doesn't work in ctfe   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3541] Add -oq to dmd (use fully qualified module name as object filename)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3453] Linking order affects proper execution   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3664] New: struct forward declaration causes enum to conflict with itself   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3664] struct forward declaration causes enum to conflict with itself   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3664] struct forward declaration causes enum to conflict with itself   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2716] Confusion of auto and scope as the class attribute   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2716] Confusion of auto and scope as the class attribute   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 1386] "string expected" when using allMembers-element in __traits(getMember, ...)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3665] New: Assignment with array slicing does not work   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3665] Assignment with array slicing does not work   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3666] New: Enhancement Request: Mixin Templates   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3650] functions are considered pointers   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3650] functions are considered pointers   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3661] ^^ not supported in array operations.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3646] Default values of function arguments are ignored when instantiating a template.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3667] New: broken out(result) in contracts   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3667] broken out(result) in contracts   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2816] Sudden-death static assert is not very useful   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3556] version(CTFE)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3668] New: foreach over typedef'd array crashes dmd   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3668] foreach over typedef'd array crashes dmd   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3668] foreach over typedef'd array crashes dmd   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3668] foreach over typedef'd array crashes dmd   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3668] foreach over typedef'd array crashes dmd   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3668] foreach over typedef'd array crashes dmd   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3668] foreach over typedef'd array crashes dmd   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3668] foreach over typedef'd array crashes dmd   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3669] New: Default parameter initialization of size_t can result in errors about implicit conversions to uint   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3670] New: Declarator grammar rule is broken   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3500] Program behaves differently with -inline   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3671] New: x^^3 gives wrong result when x is a floating-point literal   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3671] x^^3 gives wrong result when x is a floating-point literal   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3671] x^^3 gives wrong result when x is a floating-point literal   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3671] x^^3 gives wrong result when x is a floating-point literal   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3672] New: read-modify-write (rmw) operators must be disabled for shared   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3673] New: inheritance + if clause = no go   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3673] inheritance + if clause = no go   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3673] inheritance + if clause = no go   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3673] inheritance + if clause = no go   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3604] extern(C) callable function with array parameters broken   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3674] New: forward reference error with multiple overloads with same name   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3674] forward reference error with multiple overloads with same name   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3674] forward reference error with multiple overloads with same name   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3674] forward reference error with multiple overloads with same name   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3674] forward reference error with multiple overloads with same name   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3674] forward reference error with multiple overloads with same name   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3674] forward reference error with multiple overloads with same name   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3674] forward reference error with multiple overloads with same name   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3674] forward reference error with multiple overloads with same name   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3675] New: Regression: Struct literals cannot be initialized with another struct literal   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3675] Regression: Struct literals cannot be initialized with another struct literal   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3675] Regression: Struct literals cannot be initialized with another struct literal   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3675] Regression: Struct literals cannot be initialized with another struct literal   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3676] New: shared function override   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 52] ambiguous function pointer silently accepted   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3677] New: null dereference with offset not memory- at safe   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3633] Optimizer causes access violation   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3678] New: Should disallow throwing of exceptions that are not derived from Exception   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3679] New: template forward reference regression   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3679] template forward reference regression   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3679] template forward reference regression   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3649] Socket not configured for work.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3649] Socket not configured for work.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3649] Socket not configured for work.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3649] Socket not configured for work.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3649] Socket not configured for work.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3649] Socket not configured for work.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3649] Socket not configured for work.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3681] New: internal error ../ztc/go.c 244   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3681] internal error ../ztc/go.c 244   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3681] internal error ../ztc/go.c 244   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3681] ICE(go.c): when function takes too long to optimize, only with -O.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3682] New: is expression fails to match types   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3682] is expression fails to match types   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3683] New: Linker error on certain array expressions when using -release and -inline   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3683] Linker error on certain array expressions when using -release and -inline   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• ieeeFlags do not work properly   Torben Hagerup
  • ieeeFlags do not work properly   Lars T. Kyllingstad
  • ieeeFlags do not work properly   Don
    • [Issue 3684] New: Segmentation fault on wrong template instantiation syntax with typeof   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3685] New: dmd silently exits on valid code   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
      • [Issue 3685] dmd silently exits on valid code   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
      • [Issue 3685] Regression(D1 only): DMD silently exits on valid code   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
      • [Issue 3685] Regression(D1 only): DMD silently exits on valid code   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
      • [Issue 3685] Regression(D1 only): DMD silently exits on valid code   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3686] New: condExp type combining   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3687] New: Array operation "slice times scalar" tramples over memory   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
      • [Issue 3687] Array operation "slice times scalar" tramples over memory   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
      • [Issue 3687] Array operation "slice times scalar" tramples over memory   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
      • [Issue 3687] Array operation "slice times scalar" tramples over memory   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
      • [Issue 3687] Array operation "slice times scalar" tramples over memory   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
      • [Issue 3687] Array operation "slice times scalar" tramples over memory   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
      • [Issue 3687] Array operation "slice times scalar" tramples over memory   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
      • [Issue 3687] Array operation "slice times scalar" tramples over memory   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3688] New: Can't have declaration with assignment to const/immutable inside if condition   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3689] New: Grammar does not allow const(int)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3541] Add -oq to dmd (use fully qualified module name as object filename)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3690] New: Folding Complex!(Complex!T) to Complex!T   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3691] New: compiler 1.055 crashes with some invalid code in is(typeof())   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3691] compiler 1.055 crashes with some invalid code in is(typeof())   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3692] New: Compiler with associative arrays when std.variant is imported   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3692] Compiler with associative arrays when std.variant is imported   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3552] ICE(mtype.c): declaring a variable called 'AssociativeArray' then using an AA.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3693] New: Grammar missing typeof(this) and typeof(super)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3693] Grammar missing typeof(this) and typeof(super)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3207] gdb: Push D patches upstream   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2775] "private" ignored for templates   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3512] dchar iteration over string in CTFE fails   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3515] Disallow use of comma operator when declaring array dimension   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3535] struct constructors don't work in CTFE   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3557] Pure function cannot call struct constructor   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2101] CTFE: Please may I use mutable arrays at compile time?   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3694] New: Template this parameters don't work with operator overloads   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3695] New: __EOF__ token not documented   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3524] ICE(e2ir.c): using alias parameter after scope closure error   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3557] Pure function cannot call struct constructor   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3557] Pure function cannot call struct constructor   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3696] New: SuperStack   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3535] struct constructors don't work in CTFE   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3556] version(CTFE)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3556] version(CTFE)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3697] New: StructTemplateDeclaration and others missing constraint in rule   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3698] New: InterfaceDeclaration rule needs BaseInterfaceList   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2101] CTFE: Please may I use mutable arrays at compile time?   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3557] Struct constructors cannot be declared as pure   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3559] DMD 1.048+ fails to take function pointer from overloaded member functions   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3559] DMD 1.048+ fails to take function pointer from overloaded member functions   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3699] New: Feature Request: while-else   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3699] Feature Request: while-else   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3699] Feature Request: while-else   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3699] Feature Request: while-else   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3699] Feature Request: while-else   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3699] Feature Request: while-else   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3699] Feature Request: while-else   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3699] Feature Request: while-else   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3700] New: Ref foreach over large static arrays fails   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3700] Ref foreach over large static arrays fails   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3700] Ref foreach over large static arrays fails   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3700] Ref foreach over large static arrays fails   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3700] Ref foreach over large static arrays fails   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3620] Address of member of global struct isn't constant   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3701] New: Incorrect initialisation of static arrays of floating-point values   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3544] optlink termination 0041338f with recursive nested functions   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3660] Templates and shared functions don't mix   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3556] version(CTFE)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3556] version(CTFE)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3702] New: Replace __traits and is(typeof()) with a 'magic namespace'   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3556] version(CTFE)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2881] x.stringof returns typeof(x).stringof when x is an enum   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2510] provide a template instantiation backtrace when compile fails in a template   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• Static arrays / File imports cause memory leaks   bobef
  • Static arrays / File imports cause memory leaks   BCS
    • Static arrays / File imports cause memory leaks   bobef
      • Static arrays / File imports cause memory leaks   bobef
    • [Issue 3703] New: static array assignment   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3704] New: split(char[], char[]) is broken for delimiters greater than a single character   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3651] mangleof broken for enums   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2938] incorrect code generated for assignment to assoc array element   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3705] New: Can't add structs with alias this to an AA.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3706] New: delegates of interfaces with multiple inheritance fail   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3706] delegates of interfaces with multiple inheritance fail   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3706] delegates of interfaces with multiple inheritance fail   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3706] delegates of interfaces with multiple inheritance fail   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3707] New: comma-terminated array initializers not allowed with mixin   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3708] New: ImportExpression should be clear on how file is found   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3708] ImportExpression should be clear on how file is found   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3680] default struct constructor should not be removed   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3680] default struct constructor should not be removed   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3403] compiler dies with -X option   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2601] Extraneous cast introduced in member access   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 1931] dmd doesn't enforce users to use assert(0) for noreturn func   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 1847] Structs aren't aligned on stack   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2278] Guarantee alignment of stack-allocated variables on x86   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2630] ddoc should be able to document unittests   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 1396] lazy void tuple breaks   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2854] Empty struct constructor in const causes crash   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 1652] problem with /// generating strange output   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 1117] ddoc generates corrupted docs if code examples contain attributes with colons   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 1914] Array initialisation from const array yeilds memory trample   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2127] inliner turns struct "return *this" from by-value into by-ref   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3680] default struct constructor should not be removed   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3680] default struct constructor should not be removed   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3709] New: Associative array of associative arrays gets confused   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3709] Associative array of associative arrays gets confused   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3709] Associative array of associative arrays gets confused   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3709] Associative array of associative arrays gets confused   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3680] default struct constructor should not be removed   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2451] Cannot add a Variant to associative array   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2451] Cannot add a Variant to associative array   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 856] foreach doesn't work when accessing elements as supertypes   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3710] New: Typo in allMembers description?   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3711] New: Ddoc does not generate nothing if std.stdio is imported   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3711] Ddoc does not generate nothing if std.stdio is imported   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3712] New: Error message without filename or line numbers on invalid code   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3222] Place DMD front end source in a source control repository   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3713] New: Tail call optimization not enabled with the ?: operator   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3450] incorrect result for is (typeof({ ... }())) inside a struct   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2809] Wrong constant folding for unsigned shift   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3714] New: Identity assignment operator overload LEGAL for const, shared, etc.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3715] New: std.string.format can't use const/immutable toString functions   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3716] New: Regression with multi dimensional array literals   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3716] Regression with multi dimensional array literals   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2809] Wrong constant folding for unsigned shift   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 1820] default template parameters cannot be omitted   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3717] New: Stack corruption when returning a struct from a C function in a MinGW generated shared library   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3717] Stack corruption when returning a struct from a C function in a MinGW generated shared library   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2549] Segfault on array multiplication.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3066] Array operation without a slice as the lvalue accepted, bad codegen   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 1001] print stack trace (in debug mode) when program die   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2749] Make unittests named and nestable   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2066] to!(string)(int) into CTFE-compatible   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3600] template instantiation with empty tuple   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3516] Destructor not called on temporaries   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3718] New: InExpression does not support two-or-more-dimensional associative array.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3362] crippling lack of 64-bit support   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3500] Program behaves differently with -inline   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 1030] Delegate literal as initializer is confused with struct initializer   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3362] crippling lack of 64-bit support   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3719] New: forward references can cause out-of-memory error   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3719] forward references can cause out-of-memory error   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3719] forward references can cause out-of-memory error   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3362] crippling lack of 64-bit support   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3720] New: Taking address of member functions possible without an instance   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3721] New: -debug flag doesn't behave as in spec   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3722] New: A method without an in contract should always succeed, even if overridden   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2168] cast extern enhancement?   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3680] default struct constructor should not be removed   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 605] Problem w/ function overload resultion and enums.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3723] New: Regression: forward referenced enum   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3723] Regression: forward referenced enum   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3723] Regression: forward referenced enum   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3723] Regression: forward referenced enum   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3723] Regression: forward referenced enum   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3650] functions are considered pointers   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3724] New: bug in Expression::arraySyntaxCopy (null pointer dereference on struct->union->struct   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3724] bug in Expression::arraySyntaxCopy (null pointer dereference on struct->union->struct   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3724] bug in Expression::arraySyntaxCopy (null pointer dereference on struct->union->struct   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3725] New: Add united type to standard library   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3725] Add united type to standard library   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3725] Add united type to standard library   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3726] New: Assertion failure: 'fd && fd->inferRetType' on line 81 in file 'mangle.c'   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3726] Assertion failure: 'fd && fd->inferRetType' on line 81 in file 'mangle.c'   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3726] Regression: ICE(mangle.c 81): struct forward reference with static this   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3726] Regression: ICE(mangle.c 81): struct forward reference with static this   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3726] Regression: ICE(mangle.c 81): struct forward reference with static this   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3726] Regression: ICE(mangle.c 81): struct forward reference with static this   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3726] Regression: ICE(mangle.c 81): struct forward reference with static this   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2510] provide a template instantiation backtrace when compile fails in a template   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3727] New: lots of "deffering SomeStructName" messages when compiling   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3727] lots of "deffering SomeStructName" messages when compiling   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3727] lots of "deffering SomeStructName" messages when compiling   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3728] New: getOverloads and identifier traits   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3728] getOverloads and identifier traits   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3728] getOverloads and identifier traits   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3728] getOverloads and identifier traits   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3728] getOverloads and identifier traits   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3728] getOverloads and identifier traits   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3728] getOverloads and identifier traits   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3728] getOverloads and identifier traits   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3728] getOverloads and identifier traits   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3728] getOverloads and identifier traits   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3729] New: Can't define opEquals for immutable types   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3659] Too much exegesis on opEquals   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3730] New: Struct's explicit constructor can't initialize global variables   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3730] Struct's explicit constructor can't initialize global variables   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3730] Struct's explicit constructor can't initialize global variables   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3731] New: Immutable class may be changed when inherits from mutable parent   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3731] Immutable class may be changed when inherits from mutable parent   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3731] Immutable class may be changed when inherits from mutable parent   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3732] New: Not all COM interfaces inherit from IUnknown.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3732] Not all COM interfaces inherit from IUnknown.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3732] Not all COM interfaces inherit from IUnknown.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 1079] gdb: Dwarf Error: Cannot find DIE at 0xb705 referenced from DIE at 0x250   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 1079] gdb: Dwarf Error: Cannot find DIE at 0xb705 referenced from DIE at 0x250   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 1079] gdb: Dwarf Error: Cannot find DIE at 0xb705 referenced from DIE at 0x250   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3604] extern(C) callable function with array parameters broken   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• SEG-V at expression.c:6255, know issue?   BCS
  • SEG-V at expression.c:6255, know issue?   BCS
• [Issue 3569] DMD Stack Overflow with a struct member function inside a C-style struct initializer   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3282] The overload and override issue of const/immutable member functions   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3733] New: call overloaded method by shared   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2928] Swap order of paramaters for std.range's "take"   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2928] Swap order of paramaters for std.range's "take"   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3734] New: [patch] src/traits.c does not compile with gcc (Ubuntu 4.4.1-4ubuntu8) 4.4.1   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3734] [patch] src/traits.c does not compile with gcc (Ubuntu 4.4.1-4ubuntu8) 4.4.1   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3734] [patch] src/traits.c does not compile with gcc (Ubuntu 4.4.1-4ubuntu8) 4.4.1   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3488] Segfault(expression.c): enum declared with struct static initializer   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3552] ICE(mtype.c): declaring a variable called 'AssociativeArray' then using an AA.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3735] New: op=   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3736] New: corrupted struct returned by function with optimizations (-O)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3736] corrupted struct returned by function with optimizations (-O)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3737] New: SEG-V at expression.c:6255 from bad code   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3737] SEG-V at expression.c:6255 from bad code   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3737] SEG-V at expression.c:6255 from bad code   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3737] SEG-V at expression.c:6255 from bad code   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3737] SEG-V at expression.c:6255 from bad code   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3737] SEG-V at expression.c:6255 from bad code   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3737] SEG-V at expression.c:6255 from bad opDispatch   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3738] New: MinstdRand0 and MinstdRand very poor performance   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3738] MinstdRand0 and MinstdRand very poor performance   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3738] MinstdRand0 and MinstdRand very poor performance   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3738] MinstdRand0 and MinstdRand very poor performance   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3738] MinstdRand0 and MinstdRand very poor performance   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3738] MinstdRand0 and MinstdRand very poor performance   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3738] MinstdRand0 and MinstdRand very poor performance   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3739] New: Coding errors in LinearCongruentialEngine   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3739] Coding errors in LinearCongruentialEngine   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3739] Coding errors in LinearCongruentialEngine   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2008] Poor optimization of functions with ref parameters   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3252] undefined reference to package function called from an interface   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3252] undefined reference to package function called from an interface   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2008] Poor optimization of functions with ref parameters   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2008] Poor optimization of functions with ref parameters   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 918] Template order matter, version block change something with typedef, and another template bug.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 1650] Incorrect overload selected with IFTI   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 1659] template alias parameters are chosen over all but exact matches.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 918] (D1 only): Template order matter, version block change something with typedef, and another template bug.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2393] IFTI regression(D1 only) on (T:char)(T[]) vs (T:dchar)(T[])   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3740] New: build tango error   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3740] Regression: class with fwd reference of a nested struct breaks abstract   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3740] Regression: class with fwd reference of a nested struct breaks abstract   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3740] Regression: class with fwd reference of a nested struct breaks abstract   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3740] Regression: class with fwd reference of a nested struct breaks abstract   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2917] std.date fails for all years before 1970   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2917] std.date fails for all years before 1970   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3741] New: std.date YearFromTime broken or very slow   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3742] New: Please add support for 'Lightweight Profiling' which adds a set of user-controlled counters to the AMD64 architecture   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3742] Please add support for 'Lightweight Profiling' which adds a set of user-controlled counters to the AMD64 architecture   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3742] Please add support for 'Lightweight Profiling' which adds a set of user-controlled counters to the AMD64 architecture   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3743] New: Forward reference problem with static if statements   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3744] New: __traits getMember error in checking of second argument   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3744] __traits getMember error in checking of second argument   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3744] __traits getMember error in checking of second argument   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3744] __traits getMember error in checking of second argument   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3744] __traits getMember error in checking of second argument   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3744] __traits getMember error in checking of second argument   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3744] __traits getMember error in checking of second argument   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3744] __traits getMember error in checking of second argument   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3602] ICE(tocsym.c) compiling a class, if its super class has preconditions   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2712] error with passing an array slot as another array length to new   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3597] Need single source for parser and documentation grammar.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3574] post-condition is not evaluated if there is no return statement   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 1811] TypeInfo usage leads to seg fault at runtime   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3745] New: Linking error with associative array of arrays   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3746] New: Misleding error message "OP has no effect in expression XXX), in void function   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3746] Misleding error message "OP has no effect in expression XXX), in void function   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3746] Misleding error message "OP has no effect in expression XXX), in void function   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3746] Misleding error message "OP has no effect in expression XXX), in void function   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3574] post-condition in void main() is not evaluated if there is no return statement   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3651] mangleof broken for enums   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3651] mangleof broken for enums   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3651] mangleof broken for enums   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3651] mangleof broken for enums   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3747] New: D application fails with error code "c0000096 privileged instruction" under Win 7 64 bit   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3747] D application fails with error code "c0000096 privileged instruction" under Win 7 64 bit   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3747] D application fails with error code "c0000096 privileged instruction" under Win 7 64 bit   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3747] D application fails with error code "c0000096 privileged instruction" under Win 7 64 bit   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2254] Size of executable almost triples   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3748] New: inout does not work properly   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3491] typeof( (string[string]).init)) == AssociativeArray!(string, string), doesn't implicitly convert to string[string].   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3749] New: cannot evaluate ylog2x at compile time   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3749] cannot evaluate ylog2x at compile time   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3749] cannot evaluate ylog2x at compile time   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3749] cannot evaluate yl2x (log) and exp functions at compile time   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3749] cannot evaluate yl2x (log) and exp functions at compile time   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3749] cannot evaluate yl2x (log) and exp functions at compile time   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3749] cannot evaluate yl2x (log) and exp functions at compile time   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2463] No line number in "statement is not reachable" warning   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3574] post-condition in void main() is not evaluated if there is no return statement   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3750] New: Template specialization based on shared doesn't seem to work   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3751] New: Optimalization error in some floating point code   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3751] Optimalization error in some floating point code   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3751] Optimalization error in some floating point code   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3751] Optimalization error in some floating point code   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3751] Optimalization error in some floating point code   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3751] Optimalization error in some floating point code   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3751] Optimalization error in some floating point code   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3751] Optimalization error in some floating point code   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3751] Optimalization error in some floating point code   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3751] Optimalization error in some floating point code   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3752] New: File.byLine fetches lines in a confusing manner   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3752] File.byLine fetches lines in a confusing manner   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3752] File.byLine fetches lines in a confusing manner   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3167] Passing result of a function call as ref argument no longer works   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3167] Passing result of a function call as ref argument no longer works   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3167] Passing result of a function call as ref argument no longer works   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3753] New: ICE eh.c 49: Related to exception handling and alloca.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3753] ICE eh.c 49: Related to exception handling and alloca.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3753] ICE eh.c 49: Related to exception handling and alloca.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3167] Passing result of a function call as ref argument no longer works   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3167] Passing result of a function call as ref argument no longer works   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3754] New: Templates related bug   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3755] New: Regression forward declaration templates something   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3756] New: std.traits.ReturnType broken for ref returns   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3453] Linking order affects proper execution (Mac OSX only)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3453] Linking order affects proper execution (Mac OSX only)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3757] New: The overload and override issue of const/immutable member functions -2nd-   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 1298] CTFE: tuple foreach bugs   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 1790] CTFE: foreach(Tuple) won't compile if Tuple contains string   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2101] CTFE: Please may I use mutable arrays at compile time?   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2066] to!(string)(int) into CTFE-compatible   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3488] Segfault(expression.c): enum declared with struct static initializer   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3535] struct constructors don't work in CTFE   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3552] ICE(mtype.c): declaring a variable called 'AssociativeArray' then using an AA.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3556] version(CTFE)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3600] template instantiation with empty tuple   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3660] Templates and shared functions don't mix   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3282] The overload and override issue of const/immutable member functions   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3556] version(CTFE)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3758] New: Create D impementation of to!(float, string), etc.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2789] Compiler allows for method with the same signature   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3661] ^^ not supported in array operations.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3759] New: Implementing two interfaces with same final function is accepted   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3759] Implementing two interfaces with same final function is accepted   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3241] Limitations of array operations with parenthesis   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3661] ^^ not supported in array operations.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3760] New: Allow std.math pure function to be used in array operations.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3661] ^^ not supported in array operations.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3661] ^^ not supported in array operations.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3661] ^^ not supported in array operations.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3661] ^^ not supported in array operations.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2321] spec on inline asm can be misunderstood   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3569] DMD Stack Overflow with a struct member function inside a C-style struct initializer   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3421] Inline assembler problems accessing static variables   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3761] New: [Tracker]: DMD optimizer bugs   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3453] Linking order affects proper execution (Mac OSX only)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3453] Linking order affects proper execution (Mac OSX only)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3762] New: Restrictive functionality for template instance recursive expansion   d-bugmail at puremagic.com

Last message date: Sun Jan 31 17:14:50 PST 2010
Archived on: Sun Jan 31 17:15:03 PST 2010

• Messages sorted by: [ subject ] [ author ] [ date ]
• More info on this list...