The D Programming Language - Digitalmars-d-bugs

July 2010 Archives by subject

• Messages sorted by: [ thread ] [ author ] [ date ]
• More info on this list...

Starting: Thu Jul 1 00:16:33 PDT 2010
Ending: Sat Jul 31 23:11:07 PDT 2010
Messages: 500

• [Issue 1350] delegate inside tuple; wrong values   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 1350] delegate inside tuple; wrong values   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 1350] delegate literal inside tuple; wrong values   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 1418] tupleof bug on nested classes   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 1678] ref with varargs generates invalid code   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 1678] ref with varargs generates invalid code   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 1835] typeof(this) should return the type of object or some other typeof() is needed   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 1835] typeof(this) should return the type of object or some other typeof() is needed   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 1835] typeof(this) should return the type of object or some other typeof() is needed   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 1841] Closure detection doesn't work when variable is used in a nested function   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 1899] AA of fixed-length arrays fails to initialize   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 190] Cannot forward reference typedef/alias in default value for function parameter   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2050] interfaces should allow final methods with body   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2356] array literal as non static initializer generates horribly inefficient code.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2445] D2 std.demangle example doesn't compile   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2454] typeof(object) is incorrectly evaluated   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2544] implicit const casting rules allow violations of const-safety   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2615] Partial explicit instantiation not working with variadic parameter   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2742] std.stdio assumes console works in utf-8   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2834] Struct Destructors are not called by the GC, but called on explicit delete.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2834] Struct Destructors are not called by the GC, but called on explicit delete.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2834] Struct Destructors are not called by the GC, but called on explicit delete.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2834] Struct Destructors are not called by the GC, but called on explicit delete.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2834] Struct Destructors are not called by the GC, but called on explicit delete.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2834] Struct Destructors are not called by the GC, but called on explicit delete.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2834] Struct Destructors are not called by the GC, but called on explicit delete.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2931] Initialization struct with array from another struct   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2946] Make 'abstract' mandatory if the class is intended to be abstract   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2971] map no longer works with to   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3047] Foreach on tuple produces incorrect result (D1 only)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3155] LDC2 support for druntime   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3244] with -inline dmd sometime instantiates nested functions that then cannot be accessed   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3273] Regression(2.031): struct invariant + dtor fails to compile (no line number)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3285] Struct's destructor not called   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3290] accepts-invalid: non-const by-ref foreach over a const array is accepted   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3326] Regression(2.010): $ in delegate literal causes Access Violation   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3370] Compile-time global dynamic immutable arrays should NOT be constant-folded.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3408] New: compiler asks for object.d when it really expects object.di   eddie
• [Issue 3462] Add a clean way to exit a process.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3462] Add a clean way to exit a process.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3463] Integrate Precise Heap Scanning Into the GC   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3463] Integrate Precise Heap Scanning Into the GC   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3463] Integrate Precise Heap Scanning Into the GC   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3463] Integrate Precise Heap Scanning Into the GC   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3463] Integrate Precise Heap Scanning Into the GC   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3463] Integrate Precise Heap Scanning Into the GC   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3463] Integrate Precise Heap Scanning Into the GC   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3463] Integrate Precise Heap Scanning Into the GC   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3463] Integrate Precise Heap Scanning Into the GC   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3463] Integrate Precise Heap Scanning Into the GC   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3463] Integrate Precise Heap Scanning Into the GC   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3463] Integrate Precise Heap Scanning Into the GC   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3463] Integrate Precise Heap Scanning Into the GC   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3463] Integrate Precise Heap Scanning Into the GC   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3463] Integrate Precise Heap Scanning Into the GC   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3463] Integrate Precise Heap Scanning Into the GC   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3463] Integrate Precise Heap Scanning Into the GC   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3463] Integrate Precise Heap Scanning Into the GC   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3463] Integrate Precise Heap Scanning Into the GC   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3463] Integrate Precise Heap Scanning Into the GC   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3463] Integrate Precise Heap Scanning Into the GC   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3463] Integrate Precise Heap Scanning Into the GC   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3463] Integrate Precise Heap Scanning Into the GC   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3463] Integrate Precise Heap Scanning Into the GC   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3463] Integrate Precise Heap Scanning Into the GC   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3463] Integrate Precise Heap Scanning Into the GC   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3463] Integrate Precise Heap Scanning Into the GC   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3463] Integrate Precise Heap Scanning Into the GC   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3463] Integrate Precise Heap Scanning Into the GC   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3463] Integrate Precise Heap Scanning Into the GC   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3463] Integrate Precise Heap Scanning Into the GC   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3463] Integrate Precise Heap Scanning Into the GC   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3463] Integrate Precise Heap Scanning Into the GC   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3463] Integrate Precise Heap Scanning Into the GC   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3463] Integrate Precise Heap Scanning Into the GC   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3463] Integrate Precise Heap Scanning Into the GC   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3463] Integrate Precise Heap Scanning Into the GC   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3463] Integrate Precise Heap Scanning Into the GC   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3463] Integrate Precise Heap Scanning Into the GC   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3463] Integrate Precise Heap Scanning Into the GC   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3463] Integrate Precise Heap Scanning Into the GC   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3463] Integrate Precise Heap Scanning Into the GC   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3463] Integrate Precise Heap Scanning Into the GC   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3463] Integrate Precise Heap Scanning Into the GC   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3463] Integrate Precise Heap Scanning Into the GC   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3463] Integrate Precise Heap Scanning Into the GC   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3463] Integrate Precise Heap Scanning Into the GC   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3466] Wrong JSON output for templated classes, structs, and interfaces   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3490] DMD Never Inlines Functions that Could Throw   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3490] DMD Never Inlines Functions that Could Throw   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3490] DMD Never Inlines Functions that Could Throw   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3490] DMD Never Inlines Functions that Could Throw   Brad Roberts
• [Issue 3516] Destructor not called on temporaries   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3516] Destructor not called on temporaries   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3516] Destructor not called on temporaries   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3554] Ddoc generats invalid output for documentation comments with non paired paranthasis   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3554] Ddoc generats invalid output for documentation comments with non paired paranthasis   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3560] foreach on closure corrupted after function call   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3560] foreach over nested function generates wrong code   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3560] foreach over nested function generates wrong code   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3560] foreach over nested function generates wrong code   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3654] auto return doesn't work for nested functions   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3679] Regression(2.031) template forward reference regression   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3706] delegates of interfaces with multiple inheritance fail   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3706] delegates of interfaces with multiple inheritance fail   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3706] delegates of interfaces with multiple inheritance fail   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3755] Forward declaration templates something (D1 only)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3800] "Foreach over Structs and Classes with Ranges" and "Invariant Struct" in D2 Spec   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3818] Generic error message for wrong foreach   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3877] std.range.chain do not manage infinite ranges correctly   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3877] std.range.chain do not manage infinite ranges correctly   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3881] Structs as template arguments   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3934] Some untidy attributes   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3935] opBinary is instantiated with "="   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3944] Require immutable annotation for new fields of class inherited from immutable class   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3964] Hello World, Reloaded example on 1.0 page has writeln   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3964] Hello World, Reloaded example on 1.0 page has writeln   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3979] Order-of-compilation and forward reference errors   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3979] Order-of-compilation and forward reference errors   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3996] ICE Regression(2.041): Passing struct as AA template parameter (Algebraic with struct)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4077] Bugs caused by bitwise operator precedence   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4077] Bugs caused by bitwise operator precedence   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4077] Bugs caused by bitwise operator precedence   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4104] No way to get notified about D runtime termination.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4104] No way to get notified about D runtime termination.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4106] Error without line number accessing member of nonexistant struct member (D1 only)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4140] Error: non-constant expression "hello"[1u..__dollar]   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4173] Regression(2.037) Explicitly instantiated templates still try to do IFTI in some cases   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4201] associative arrays keys property contains corrupted data for keys property for keys of size < size_t   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4201] associative arrays keys property contains corrupted data for keys property for keys of size < size_t   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4240] Array operations on short fixed-length arrays should be inlined   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4240] Array operations on short fixed-length arrays should be inlined   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4240] Array operations on short fixed-length arrays should be inlined   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4240] Array operations on short fixed-length arrays should be inlined   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4240] Array operations on short fixed-length arrays should be inlined   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4240] Array operations on short fixed-length arrays should be inlined   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4246] Delegate literals passed to variadic templates function incorrectly   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4246] Delegate literals passed to variadic templates function incorrectly   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4246] Delegate literals passed to variadic templates function incorrectly   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4251] Hole in the const system: immutable values can be overwritten (const(T) is appendable to const(T)[])   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4251] Hole in the const system: immutable values can be overwritten (const(T) is appendable to const(T)[])   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4264] Various std.algorithm.map problems   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4264] Various std.algorithm.map problems   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4264] Various std.algorithm.map problems   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4264] Various std.algorithm.map problems   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4264] Various std.algorithm.map problems   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4298] Constant array translated to unnecessary array literal creation   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4309] String literal passed by ref causes segfault   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4329] Do not show error messages that refer to __error   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4329] Do not show error messages that refer to __error   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4329] Do not show error messages that refer to __error   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4343] Associative Arrays of static arrays == range violation   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4344] Sockets with multiple threads report missing/failed WSAStartup   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4359] Erroneous behaviour of variables in a delegate literal passed as template tuple parameter   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4359] Erroneous behaviour of variables in a delegate literal passed as template tuple parameter   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4360] Allow intrinsics in core.bitop to operate as intrinsics   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4360] Allow intrinsics in core.bitop to operate as intrinsics   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4360] Allow intrinsics in core.bitop to operate as intrinsics   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4360] Allow intrinsics in core.bitop to operate as intrinsics   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4363] Some phobos ranges are not forward ranges (but should be)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4385] Uncaught exceptions should dump a core   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4385] Uncaught exceptions should dump a core   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4385] Uncaught exceptions should dump a core   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4396] mkdir race prevents concurrent compiling with DMD using make -j   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4396] mkdir race prevents concurrent compiling with DMD using make -j   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4397] const/CTFE does not work   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4397] const/CTFE does not work   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4397] const/CTFE does not work   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4397] const/CTFE does not work   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4397] const/CTFE does not work   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4397] const/CTFE does not work   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4397] const/CTFE does not work   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4397] const/CTFE does not work   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4397] const/CTFE does not work   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4397] D1 const/CTFE does not work   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4400] D2 GC doesn't allocate with 16 bytes alignment   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4401] auto functions cannot be inner functions   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4401] auto functions cannot be inner functions   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4410] AA has inconsistent and unreasonable requirements for iterating over reference-type index   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4410] AA has inconsistent and unreasonable requirements for iterating over reference-type index   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4410] AA has inconsistent and unreasonable requirements for iterating over reference-type index   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4410] New: AA has inconsistent and unreasonable requirements for iterating over reference-type index   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4411] New: ranges + auto functions don't work   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4411] ranges + auto functions don't work   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4412] Array capacity growth spikey and the ratio approaches 1.0   Andrei Alexandrescu
• [Issue 4412] Array capacity growth spikey and the ratio approaches 1.0   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4412] Array capacity growth spikey and the ratio approaches 1.0   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4412] Array capacity growth spikey and the ratio approaches 1.0   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4412] Array capacity growth spikey and the ratio approaches 1.0   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4412] Array capacity growth spikey and the ratio approaches 1.0   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4412] Array capacity growth spikey and the ratio approaches 1.0   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4412] Array capacity growth spikey and the ratio approaches 1.0   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4412] Array capacity growth spikey and the ratio approaches 1.0   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4412] Array capacity growth spikey and the ratio approaches 1.0   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4412] Array capacity growth spikey and the ratio approaches 1.0   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4412] Array capacity growth spikey and the ratio approaches 1.0   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4412] New: Array capacity growth spikey and the ratio approaches 1.0   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4413] New: typeof(this) doesn't work in method template signature   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4414] [ICE] Taking item of static array returned by function   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4414] New: [ICE] Taking item of static array returned by function   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4415] code generation for std.all fails on fedora   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4415] New: code generation for std.all fails on fedora   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4416] New: Function with ref argument breaks struct method const attribute   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4417] New: const-violation in struct error message   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4418] Is alloca() pure?   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4418] Is alloca() pure?   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4418] New: Is alloca() pure?   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4419] New: __gshared static in class has no effect   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4420] insertBack() for SList   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4420] insertBack() for SList   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4420] insertBack() for SList   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4420] insertBack() for SList   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4420] insertBack() for SList   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4420] insertBack() for SList   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4420] insertBack() for SList   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4420] New: insertBack() for SList   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4421] New: Union propagates copy constructors and destructors over all members   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4422] New: std.c.osx.socket and std.c.linux.socket cause symbol conflict   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4423] New: enums of struct types   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4424] Copy constructor and templated opAssign cannot coexist   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4424] New: Copy constructor and templated opAssign cannot coexist   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4425] New: More bells & whistles for bitfields   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4426] New: assert(condition, string) fails in std.array.back   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4427] __traits should have isFunction, isVariable, etc   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4427] __traits should have isFunction, isVariable, etc   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4427] __traits should have isFunction, isVariable, etc   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4427] __traits should have isFunction, isVariable, etc   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4427] __traits should have isFunction, isVariable, etc   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4427] New: __traits should have isFunction, isVariable, etc   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4428] New: string mixin of variable of type string fails   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4428] string mixin of variable of type string fails   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4428] string mixin of variable of type string fails   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4429] .keys for V[real] broken   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4429] .keys for V[real] broken   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4429] New: .keys for V[real] broken   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4430] erroneous matching on specialized template function   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4430] New: erroneous matching on specialized template function   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4430] Regression(2.037) erroneous matching on specialized template function   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4431] New: Template favors alias parameter for struct   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4432] New: DMD r575 won't build on Linux in debug mode: undefined reference to obj_long   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4433] New: object.Error: Access Violation missing file and line number   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4433] object.Error: Access Violation missing file and line number   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4434] New: Assertion failed: (tn->mod & MODimmutable || tn->mod & MODshared), function check, file mtype.c, line 887.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4435] Multiple-inheritance of Interfaces results in final/static method/function hijacking   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4435] New: Multiple-inheritance of Interfaces results in final/static method/function hijacking   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4436] New: Double bug regarding Tuple.init   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4437] New: copy construction bug with "return this;"   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4438] A missed function inlining   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4438] A missed function inlining   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4438] A missed function inlining   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4438] New: A missed function inlining   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4439] New: The declaration of the in6addr_* in druntime is wrong.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4440] inlined delegates produces different asm than straight lined code   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4440] inlined delegates produces different asm than straight lined code   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4440] inlined delegates produces different asm than straight lined code   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4440] inlined delegates produces different asm than straight lined code   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4440] inlined delegates produces different asm than straight lined code   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4440] inlined delegates produces different asm than straight lined code   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4440] inlined delegates produces different asm than straight lined code   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4440] New: inlined delegates produces different asm than straight lined code   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4441] New: TDPL Example on P401 & 402 doesn't compile on D2.047, 2.046, 2.045, 2.044. Seems to be a problem involves tuples and []   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4441] TDPL Example on P401 & 402 doesn't compile on D2.047, 2.046, 2.045, 2.044. Seems to be a problem involves tuples and []   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4441] TDPL Example on P401 & 402 doesn't compile on D2.047, 2.046, 2.045, 2.044. Seems to be a problem involves tuples and []   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4442] Destructors not called for new-allocated struct objects   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4442] New: Destructors not called for new-allocated struct objects   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4443] New: Optimizer produces wrong code for statements after loop   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4443] Optimizer produces wrong code for statements after loop   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4443] Optimizer produces wrong code for || or && with struct arrays   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4444] New: Cannot index built-in array with expression tuple   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4445] New: roundTo!ubyte(255.0) throws   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4446] New: Templated function result can't be ref if tiargs are infered w/ value tiarg   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4447] New: order of functions greatly affects execution time   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4447] order of functions greatly affects execution time   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4448] New: labeled break doesn't work in CTFE   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4449] ICE(glue.c) on failed type inference against associative array   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4449] New: ICE(glue.c) on failed type inference against associative array   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4450] New: writefln throws unexpected runtime error   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4450] writefln throws unexpected runtime error   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4450] writefln throws unexpected runtime error   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4451] Escaping reference to local array error for slices   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4451] New: Escaping reference to local array error for slices   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4452] Incorrect result of BigInt ^^ long   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4452] New: Incorrect result of BigInt ^^ long   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4453] New: Loop-invariant code motion for pure functions   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4454] New: Can't implicitly cast static arrays of primitives to immutable   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4455] New: Taking the sqrt of an integer shouldn't require an explicit cast.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4455] Taking the sqrt of an integer shouldn't require an explicit cast.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4456] New: std.range Recurrence is horribly broken   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4456] std.range Recurrence is horribly broken   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4456] std.range Recurrence is horribly broken   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4457] New: Sockets on OSX terminate apps with SIGPIPE and there's no (official) way to turn it off   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4458] New: Static typing for format strings, when possible   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4459] New: bad format - phobos/std/all.d - 2.047   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4460] New: (2.047) Internal error when compiling foreach over associative array literal   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4461] New: iota completely broken when using negative integers   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4462] New: core.cpuid wrong on Intel machines w/ multiple physical CPUs   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4463] New: double.init in associative array seems 0.0   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4464] New: std.range.take does not always return Take!R   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4465] ICE: assigning power to immutable and returning result   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4465] New: ICE: assigning power to immutable in nested function   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4466] New: std.conv: parse!(T, S)(S, uint radix) the opposite of to to!(T, S)(S, uint radix)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4466] std.conv: parse!(T, S)(S, uint radix) the opposite of to to!(T, S)(S, uint radix)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4466] std.conv: parse!(T, S)(S, uint radix) the opposite of to to!(T, S)(S, uint radix)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4467] New: type deduction fails when combining array() and uniq()   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4467] type deduction fails when combining array() and uniq()   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4468] New: std.string.join() for lazy iterable of strings   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4469] New: [ICE] function literals class member   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4470] New: Problems with std.bigint mod and divide   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4470] Problems with std.bigint mod and divide   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4470] Problems with std.bigint mod and divide   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4470] Problems with std.bigint mod and divide   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4470] Problems with std.bigint mod and divide   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4471] New: rebindable() helper function   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4472] New: Update D2 Enhancements to D1   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4473] New: Migrating to D2 needs operator overloading   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4474] Better stdin.byLine()   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4474] Better stdin.byLine()   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4474] Better stdin.byLine()   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4474] Better stdin.byLine()   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4474] Better stdin.byLine()   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4474] New: Safer stdin.byLine()   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4474] Safer stdin.byLine()   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4475] New: Improving the compiler 'in' associative array can return just a bool   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4476] __traits for more kinds of names   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4476] New: __traits for more kinds of names   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4477] New: JSON output for function definitions includes insufficient type information   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4478] New: JSON output omits import statements   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4479] Module Foo is in multiple files Foo   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4479] New: Module Foo is in multiple files Foo   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4480] New: JSON: include location range, not just line numbers, for everything   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4481] Internal compiler error (glue.c, !vthis->csym) or compiles, depending on the import statements order   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4481] Internal compiler error (glue.c, !vthis->csym) or compiles, depending on the import statements order   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4481] Internal compiler error (glue.c, !vthis->csym) or compiles, depending on the import statements order   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4481] Internal compiler error (glue.c, !vthis->csym) or compiles, depending on the import statements order   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4481] New: Internal compiler error (glue.c, !vthis->csym) or compiles, depending on the import statements order   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4482] New: Missing warnings when not compiling with -w   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4483] Make foreach over string or wstring where element type not specified a warning   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4483] New: Make foreach over string or wstring where element type not specified a warning   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4484] New: Warning for unreachable code in scope statements is too confusing   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4485] New: CT only arrays appear in executable   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4486] New: CodeView debug info should contain absolute path names   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4487] 16 bytes long structs requires 32 bytes if allocated singularly on the heap   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4487] New: 16 bytes long structs requires 32 bytes if allocated singularly on the heap   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4488] Faster fixed-size array initialization from literal   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4488] Faster fixed-size array initialization from literal   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4488] Faster fixed-size array initialization from literal   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4488] New: Faster fixed-size array initialization from literal   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4489] New: std.array.insert is slow   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4490] File ref counting broken for anonymous File structs   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4490] New: File ref counting broken for anonymous File structs   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4491] Assigning large const value to ulong type results in "signed integer overflow"   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4491] Assigning large const value to ulong type results in "signed integer overflow"   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4491] Assigning large const value to ulong type results in "signed integer overflow"   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4491] New: Assigning large const value to ulong type results in "signed integer overflow"   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4492] New: Version of take() which takes from the back of a range   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4492] Version of take() which takes from the back of a range   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4492] Version of take() which takes from the back of a range   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4492] Version of take() which takes from the back of a range   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4492] Version of take() which takes from the back of a range   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4492] Version of take() which takes from the back of a range   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4492] Version of take() which takes from the back of a range   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4492] Version of take() which takes from the back of a range   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4492] Version of take() which takes from the back of a range   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4492] Version of take() which takes from the back of a range   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4492] Version of take() which takes from the back of a range   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4493] New: std.json unittest is broken   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4493] std.json unittest is broken   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4494] New: [ICE] Array literal filled with results of void function   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4495] New: The -Hd (import file generation directory) option for DMD doesn't work correctly in 2.047.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4496] New: aa.get broken when using get and opIndexAssign in same statement   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4497] inexpressive error message for const object method   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4497] inexpressive error message for const object method   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4497] New: inexpressive error message for const object method   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4498] New: cannot get return type of a function returning a nested struct with typeof   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4499] New: calls to @disabled postblit are emitted   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4500] New: scoped moves class after calling the constructor   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4500] scoped moves class after calling the constructor   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4500] scoped moves class after calling the constructor   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4500] scoped moves class after calling the constructor   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4500] scoped moves class after calling the constructor   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4501] New: Can't call templated properties as properties from within class   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4502] make dmd compilable with MinGW   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4502] New: make dmd compilable with MinGW   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4503] forward reference to aliased template instance   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4503] forward reference to aliased template instance   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4503] forward reference to aliased template instance   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4503] forward reference to aliased template instance   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4503] forward reference to aliased template instance   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4503] New: forward reference to aliased template instance   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4504] Internal compiler error using std.algorithm.count with recursive nested function and -inline.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4504] Internal compiler error using std.algorithm.count with recursive nested function and -inline.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4504] Internal compiler error using std.algorithm.count with recursive nested function in release.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4504] Internal compiler error using std.algorithm.count with recursive nested function in release.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4504] New: Internal compiler error using std.algorithm.count with recursive nested function in release.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4505] New: Type literal of pure function pointer inside function signature   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4506] -O flag breaks some recursive functions.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4506] -O flag breaks some recursive functions.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4506] New: -O flag breaks some recursive functions.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4506] Regression(2.034): -O flag breaks some recursive functions.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4506] Regression(2.034): -O flag breaks some recursive functions.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4506] Regression(2.034): -O flag breaks some recursive functions.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4507] New: use spellchecker when override function doesn't override anything   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4507] use spellchecker when override function doesn't override anything   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4508] New: tuples should be indexable with foreach over range   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4509] New: XML parser in std.xml throws TagException if the attr value is put in apostrophes.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4510] accepts-invalid: ref with a wrong type specifier is accepted   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4510] New: accepts-invalid: ref with a wrong type specifier is accepted   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4511] New: Contravariance problem   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4512] Class with abstract method   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4512] New: Class with abstract method   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4513] New: Unclear template template error message   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4514] New: Regression: Cannot cast from X* to X   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4514] Regression: Cannot cast from X* to X   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4514] Regression: Cannot cast from X* to X   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4514] Regression: Cannot cast from X* to X   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4514] Regression: Cannot cast from X* to X   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4514] Regression: Cannot cast from X* to X   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4514] Regression: Cannot cast from X* to X   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4514] Regression: Cannot cast from X* to X   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4515] Compiler crashes when accessing a static array returned by a function   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4515] New: Compiler crashes when accessing a static array returned by a function   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4516] forward declaration of enum not supported   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4516] forward declaration of enum not supported   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4516] forward declaration of enum not supported   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4516] forward declaration of enum not supported   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4516] New: forward declaration of enum not supported   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4517] New: final switch over with base type allows missing values   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4518] New: to!string(enum w/invalid value) produces a somewhat unhelpful error   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4519] New: variable shadowing error from std.format   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4520] add support for //! style documentation comments   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4520] add support for //! style documentation comments   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4520] add support for //! style documentation comments   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4520] add support for //! style documentation comments   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4520] add support for //! style documentation comments   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4520] add support for //! style documentation comments   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4520] New: add support for //! style documentation comments   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4521] accepts-invalid Array-wise assignment on unallocated array is accepted   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4521] Array-wise assignment on unallocated array is accepted   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4521] Array-wise assignment on unallocated array is accepted   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4521] Array-wise assignment on unallocated array is accepted   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4521] Array-wise assignment on unallocated array is accepted   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4521] Array-wise assignment on unallocated array is accepted   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4521] New: accepts-invalid Array-wise assignment on unallocated array is accepted   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4522] New: Write outputs Unicode incorrectly (on Windows)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4522] Write outputs Unicode incorrectly (on Windows)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4523] .remove method for Associative Arrays returns void in all cases   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4523] .remove method for Associative Arrays returns void in all cases   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4523] New: .remove method for Associative Arrays returns void in all cases   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4524] Bus error with nested struct   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4524] New: Bus error with nested struct   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4525] Array member call syntax can't find matches in current class   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4525] Array member call syntax can't find matches in current class   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4525] New: Array member call syntax can't find matches in current class   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4526] dmd crash with writeln of functions   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4526] New: dmd crash with writeln of functions   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4526] New: dmd crash with writeln of functions   Brad Roberts
• [Issue 4526] New: dmd crash with writeln of functions   bearophile
• [Issue 4527] New: writeln/typeid to use string type names   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4528] New: Better error message for private abstract method   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4529] New: dmd crash with writeln of functions   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4530] New: Tidier function types   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4530] Tidier function types   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4530] Tidier function types   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4530] Tidier function types   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4530] Tidier function types   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4531] New: [2.046] No constructors with variable type list   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4532] New: Position specifiers don't work in format   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4532] Position specifiers don't work in format   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4533] Ban public aliases to private symbols   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4533] Ban public aliases to private symbols   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4533] Ban public aliases to private symbols   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4533] Ban public aliases to private symbols   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4533] New: Ban public aliases to private symbols   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4534] New: Dmd crash with templates   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4535] New: std.range could have a takeWhile!pred(range) function   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4536] New: Typetuples (T...) should have an .init member   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4537] Confusing error message when foreach lacks semicolon (; )   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4537] New: Confusing error message when foreach lacks semicolon (; )   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4538] Listed complexity of reverse() is incorrect   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4538] New: Listed complexity of reverse() is incorrect   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4539] New: Refuse assignment to string literal   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4539] Refuse assignment to string literal   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4539] Refuse assignment to string literal   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4539] Refuse assignment to string literal   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4539] Refuse assignment to string literal   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4539] Refuse assignment to string literal   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4540] New: Better error message for wrong switch type   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4541] New: Intrinsic functions do not have pointers   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4542] New: TDPL NVI example results in linker error   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4542] TDPL NVI example results in linker error   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 676] These two funcs shouldn't conflict   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 774] indexing / slicing a const arrays causes: "Error: non-constant expression"   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 859] float vector codegen after inlining very different from manual inlined code   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 859] float vector codegen after inlining very different from manual inlined code   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 859] float vector codegen after inlining very different from manual inlined code   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 859] Improve compiler inlining   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• Bug Of pow in std.math   Simen kjaeraas
• Bug Of pow in std.math   sins666
• Incorrect behavior of -Hd option   Jay Sistar
• outage (already over)   Brad Roberts

Last message date: Sat Jul 31 23:11:07 PDT 2010
Archived on: Sat Jul 31 23:15:04 PDT 2010

• Messages sorted by: [ thread ] [ author ] [ date ]
• More info on this list...