[Issue 2656] Require 0o format for octal literals
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
Fri Mar 12 10:47:44 PST 2010
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2656
--- Comment #8 from Andrei Alexandrescu <andrei at metalanguage.com> 2010-03-12 10:47:43 PST ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> octal!"10"
>
> - This is ugly looking;
(a) subjective (for one, I find 0o or whatever way uglier)
(b) then all templates are ugly
> - it's too much long to write & takes too much space;
how many octal literals do you have in your code right now?
> - editors will need extra code to recognize that as a number and color it with
> the color used for numbers;
it's an editor issue
> - It can create a good number of templates and compile-time strings.
it's a compiler implementation issue; the template could embed a ctfe.
> So I think this idea needs to be shot in the head.
There is no solid argument against it above.
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
More information about the Digitalmars-d-bugs
mailing list