[Issue 4156] New: Segfault with array+=array
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
Mon May 3 14:01:07 PDT 2010
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4156
Summary: Segfault with array+=array
Product: D
Version: 2.034
Platform: Other
OS/Version: Windows
Status: NEW
Keywords: ice-on-invalid-code, patch
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: DMD
AssignedTo: nobody at puremagic.com
ReportedBy: clugdbug at yahoo.com.au
--- Comment #0 from Don <clugdbug at yahoo.com.au> 2010-05-03 14:01:06 PDT ---
void main() {
int[] a = [1,2];
int[] b = [1,2];
a+= b;
}
arr.d(5): Error: Array operations not implemented
<segfault>
For any assign operation other than +=, it creates wrong code.
It crashes because AddAssignExp::toElem (e2ir.c line 2934) returns an
uninitialized variable.
error("Array operations not implemented");
+ e = el_long(type->totym(), 0); // error recovery
But actually I think it's better to put the check into BinExp::toElemBin
(e2ir.c line 1968), since this test should be performed for all operations,
and then remove the check from AddAssignExp.
line 1930:
elem *AddAssignExp::toElem(IRState *irs)
{
return toElemBin(irs,OPaddass);
}
line 1968:
elem *BinExp::toElemBin(IRState *irs,int op)
{
//printf("toElemBin() '%s'\n", toChars());
+ Type *tb1 = e1->type->toBasetype();
+ Type *tb2 = e2->type->toBasetype();
+
+ if ((tb1->ty == Tarray || tb1->ty == Tsarray) &&
+ (tb2->ty == Tarray || tb2->ty == Tsarray) &&
+ (op == OPadd || op == OPmin || op == OPmul ||
+ op == OPdiv || op == OPmod ||
+ op == OPaddass || op == OPminass || op == OPmulass ||
+ op == OPdivass || op == OPmodass)
+ )
+ {
+ error("Array operation %s not implemented", toChars());
+ return el_long(type->totym(), 0); // error recovery
+ }
tym_t tym = type->totym();
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
More information about the Digitalmars-d-bugs
mailing list