[Issue 2946] Make 'abstract' mandatory if the class is intended to be abstract

[d-bugmail at puremagic.com]

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2946



--- Comment #4 from bearophile_hugs at eml.cc 2010-10-29 05:01:02 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> The compiler is behaving correctly, therefore this is an enhancement request.

We need a different term to tell apart true enhancement requests (where someone
asks for a new feature or new subfeature) from bugs in the specs.

This is a case where the specs are suboptimal, so this is not a true
enhancement request, it's a way to fix a little mistake in the D specs.

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------