[Issue 2946] Make 'abstract' mandatory if the class is intended to be abstract

[d-bugmail at puremagic.com]

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2946



--- Comment #7 from Stewart Gordon <smjg at iname.com> 2010-10-30 17:22:30 PDT ---
Certainly the Java design is more sensible on this.  But "correct" in terms of
design is to some degree a matter of opinion.  There are a number of aspects of
D's design that I would consider mistakes - inheritance protection, archaic
switch syntax, implicit narrowing conversions just to name a few.  There are
probably lots filed here.  How would we label such issues on this basis,
anyway?

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------