[Issue 5748] @naked annotation

[d-bugmail at puremagic.com]

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5748



--- Comment #3 from Walter Bright <bugzilla at digitalmars.com> 2011-03-17 16:04:04 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Should an attribute be necessarily part of function interface? MSVC uses
> __declspec(naked), which is not part of the function interface
> (http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/h5w10wxs%28v=vs.80%29.aspx). Also, the
> GNU compiler uses __attribute__((naked)). Having "naked" in the assembly block
> has never felt right, really.

Naked is an internal characteristic of a function, not an external one. It
simply does not belong in the declaration, despite the existence of poorly
designed extensions in other languages.

Think of it this way - is it a good design to have to change your header files
if you change your implementation?

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------