[Issue 5748] @naked annotation

[d-bugmail at puremagic.com]

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5748


Don <clugdbug at yahoo.com.au> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |clugdbug at yahoo.com.au


--- Comment #7 from Don <clugdbug at yahoo.com.au> 2011-03-18 07:27:29 PDT ---
Somewhat related is the Pervert Bug: (bug 2350).
Really, the compiler should be a lot stricter on what it allows inside a naked
function. IMHO, the main reason people feel that there's a need for annotation,
is that DMD currently allows a lot of garbage to compile. If the compiler were
adequately strict, it'd be clear it was an asm-only issue.

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------