[Issue 7014] Better union initialization syntax
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
Sat Nov 26 08:44:51 PST 2011
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7014
timon.gehr at gmx.ch changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |timon.gehr at gmx.ch
--- Comment #1 from timon.gehr at gmx.ch 2011-11-26 08:43:51 PST ---
(In reply to comment #0)
>
> But I don't like that GNU-C idea, a problem with cast() is that it's not
> precise enough, if there are two fields like this, what is a good way to assign
> 's' or 'u' using a cast()?
>
> union Foo { int s; uint u; };
cast(Foo)cast(uint)exp
cast(Foo)cast(int)exp
You understand that both are assigned, regardless of which one you choose and
ergo it is never a problem?
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
More information about the Digitalmars-d-bugs
mailing list