[Issue 3757] Overloading const function with overridden non-const function results in seg fault.
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
Mon Oct 31 08:03:50 PDT 2011
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3757
Steven Schveighoffer <schveiguy at yahoo.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords|spec |wrong-code
Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED
CC| |schveiguy at yahoo.com
Version|2.040 |D2
Resolution|INVALID |
Summary|The overload and override |Overloading const function
|issue of const/immutable |with overridden non-const
|member functions -2nd- |function results in seg
| |fault.
OS/Version|Windows |All
--- Comment #1 from Steven Schveighoffer <schveiguy at yahoo.com> 2011-10-31 08:02:36 PDT ---
This is neither invalid nor fixed. Tested in Linux 32-bit.
Tested with 2.055:
Base.f()
Derived.f() const
Derived.f() const
Tested with 2.056:
Base.f()
Derived.f()
Segmentation fault
Clearly there is some invalid vtable stuff going on here. Probably was going
on before, but manifested in a different way. If I remove the base class from
the picture, it correctly prints out:
Derived.f()
Derifed.f() const
Expected printout for original code should be:
Base.f()
Derived.f()
Derived.f() const
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
More information about the Digitalmars-d-bugs
mailing list