[Issue 7932] Corrupted argument inside out contract for protected methods when compiling with -O in x86_64

[d-bugmail at puremagic.com]

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7932


Don <clugdbug at yahoo.com.au> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |clugdbug at yahoo.com.au


--- Comment #1 from Don <clugdbug at yahoo.com.au> 2012-04-17 22:37:23 PDT ---
Adding assert(this); at the start of the body of f() makes the bug disappear.
I think this is why 'protected' is required; if it is public, the assert(this)
is automatically added.

Comparing the generated code for the three cases 
(a) -O, fails
(b)  without -O, passes
(c)  -O + assert(this), passes
I can't see any obvious explanation. case (a) has the f() body of case (b), and
the main() body of case (c).

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------