[Issue 7196] Unfair function address overload resolution

[d-bugmail at puremagic.com]

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7196



--- Comment #5 from Kenji Hara <k.hara.pg at gmail.com> 2012-01-02 18:18:56 PST ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> If the compiler rewrites (&foo)(arguments...) to foo(arguments...), is it now
> able to inline delegates that are called directly like for example {x++;}() ?

Sorry, I'm not sure the meaning of 'inline'.
If you means 'optimizing', I don't know direct called delegate would be inlined
or not...

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------