[Issue 7176] Lambda => syntax for function and methods too
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
Tue Jan 3 16:49:25 PST 2012
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7176
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan M Davis <jmdavisProg at gmx.com> 2012-01-03 16:48:12 PST ---
It's very different IMHO to introduce it in lambdas which are already part of
an expression and where the number of characters definitely matters than it is
to introduce it in normal function declarations. With declarations, they're on
their own instead of part of a larger expression. They just don't present the
same kind of gain and therefore don't merit the cost of the large departure in
syntax IMHO.
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
More information about the Digitalmars-d-bugs
mailing list