[Issue 7312] const should be abstract

[d-bugmail at puremagic.com]

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7312


Don <clugdbug at yahoo.com.au> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |clugdbug at yahoo.com.au


--- Comment #3 from Don <clugdbug at yahoo.com.au> 2012-06-27 00:06:13 PDT ---
It is currently possible to declare 'const int' variables even though they are
identical to 'immutable int' ones. This is similar.

And consider:

const[] foo(S y) pure { ... }

With this proposal, that's OK for struct S, as long as the struct has a
pointer.
But if S has no pointers, the return value needs to be immutable.
That's just annoying.

This proposal doesn't add any value.

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------