[Issue 6253] Refuse definition too of impossible associative arrays

[d-bugmail at puremagic.com]

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6253


hsteoh at quickfur.ath.cx changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |hsteoh at quickfur.ath.cx


--- Comment #5 from hsteoh at quickfur.ath.cx 2012-03-19 20:45:56 PDT ---
Does (In reply to comment #4)
> AA keys don't have to be immutable, they just have to be a type that implicitly
> converts to immutable.  This is the same requirement for parameters of strongly
> pure functions.

Does this mean AA keys should be stored as immutable internally?

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------