[Issue 6253] Refuse definition too of impossible associative arrays

[d-bugmail at puremagic.com]

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6253



--- Comment #6 from yebblies <yebblies at gmail.com> 2012-03-20 16:48:54 EST ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> Does (In reply to comment #4)
> > AA keys don't have to be immutable, they just have to be a type that implicitly
> > converts to immutable.  This is the same requirement for parameters of strongly
> > pure functions.
> 
> Does this mean AA keys should be stored as immutable internally?

I'd say yes, tail-immutable.

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------