[Issue 10819] Invalid comparison for equality of lambda functions

[d-bugmail at puremagic.com]

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10819



--- Comment #7 from Peter Alexander <peter.alexander.au at gmail.com> 2013-08-31 03:53:53 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> This is probably total overkill, but what about instead of mangling to __lambda
> + an incrementing integer, replace the integer with the SHA hash of the
> lambda's AST tree? As Andrei said, we cater only to the case where the two
> lambdas are token-for-token identical, because the general problem of
> equivalence between two arbitrary lambdas is uncomputable.

That works but is it OK for the lambda type to not have a module?

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------