[Issue 11684] SIGSEGV with ld.bfd version 2.22
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
Sun Dec 22 13:11:20 PST 2013
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11684
--- Comment #14 from github-bugzilla at puremagic.com 2013-12-22 13:11:12 PST ---
Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/commit/8dce20837d4ae909ac98bc21354a7ba2d86cf902
fix Issue 11684 - SIGSEGV with ld.bfd version 2.22
- Don't use zero extended relocations in data segment,
because we need to write out the whole 8-byte address.
- Data relocations don't depend on PIC.
- This regression was introduced with
0cba87c6330cd7853139f51448c0f98372fb76d7.
Before this commit the code still wrote out
an 8-byte address, so the zero extension worked
happened to work for <4GB binaries.
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/commit/e8d0efc8ea7c2fe35f859dd5dce486b5361ae1ed
Merge pull request #3011 from MartinNowak/fix11684
[2.065,Reg] fix Issue 11684 - SIGSEGV with ld.bfd version 2.22
--
Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
More information about the Digitalmars-d-bugs
mailing list