[Issue 11832] std.datetime: ddoc warnings
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
Fri Dec 27 16:27:29 PST 2013
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11832
Jonathan M Davis <jmdavisProg at gmx.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jmdavisProg at gmx.com
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan M Davis <jmdavisProg at gmx.com> 2013-12-27 16:27:23 PST ---
@9999
Yes, any changes to std.datetime will cause me more merge problems in finishing
splitting std.datetime, but if any changes actually need to get in (e.g. a bug
fix), then they should be merged (and then I'll just have to deal with the
merge conflicts), particularly since I've been swamped at work for the past few
months and unable to finish splitting std.datetime (I'm in the middle of
reworking the documentation at this point). Right now, I'm expecting to get
back to D stuff towards the beginning of February, but I'm effectively a road
block until then with regards to any std.datetime changes which rely on me, and
while I'd prefer that more changes not be made to std.datetime in the interim
and cause me more work, if they need to be done, they need to be done. But I
would appreciate it if trivial stuff didn't get changed as it will create more
work for me.
I'll make sure that all such warnings are fixed as I rework the documentation,
but if anyone feels like they need to be fixed before that, then they can
create a pull request for it.
--
Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
More information about the Digitalmars-d-bugs
mailing list