[Issue 9300] Syntax for loop invariants
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
Tue Feb 5 02:08:53 PST 2013
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9300
--- Comment #1 from Don <clugdbug at yahoo.com.au> 2013-02-05 02:08:47 PST ---
Loop invariants were part of the D spec, a long time ago. They were discarded
as being of negligible value.
Compared to an assert, plus a comment, what do they add?
while (cond)
{
// Loop invariant
assert( xxx );
...
}
Definitely the concept is very useful for reasoning about code. But that
doesn't mean it needs specific language syntax. For example, it's easy for a
static analysis tool to recognize this as a loop invariant. And I don't think
you'll find a syntax that is nicer than what I wrote above!
This is a feature which was previously evaluated and rejected.
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
More information about the Digitalmars-d-bugs
mailing list