[Issue 5219] @noheap annotation

[d-bugmail at puremagic.com]

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5219



--- Comment #13 from bearophile_hugs at eml.cc 2013-02-20 09:42:39 PST ---
(In reply to comment #11)

> More than just annotating "no GC" or "no Heap", what would be nice is being
> able to mark any sections with the same qualifiers as functions.

This is an interesting idea, but it's essentially orthogonal to the idea of a
@noheap.

There was already a discussion about introducing @trusted{...}. So generalizing
that idea to all of them isn't a big leap.

But it's stuff for a different enhancement request:

- - - - - - - -

Code section support for @trusted, @safe, pure, nothrow

In this thread David Nadlinger has suggested a @trusted" declaration/block:

http://forum.dlang.org/thread/blrglebkzhrilxkbprgh@forum.dlang.org

if that feature will be introduced, then maybe it's worth introducing a
generalization of it, supporting the block syntax for @trusted{}, @safe{},
pure{}, nothrow{}.pure{}, nothrow{}.

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------