[Issue 6856] Absence of in() contract (precondition) should mean "use default precondition" instead of "ignore inherited in() contracts"

[d-bugmail at puremagic.com]

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6856


bearophile_hugs at eml.cc changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |bearophile_hugs at eml.cc


--- Comment #29 from bearophile_hugs at eml.cc 2013-01-21 17:12:25 PST ---
(In reply to comment #28)

> But it'll probably be rejected because the code breakage that would result.

In several cases breaking some code is the best solution. Is this one of those
cases?

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------