[Issue 1619] "Missing initializer for const field" only reported if an explicit constructor is present

[d-bugmail at puremagic.com]

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1619


Andrej Mitrovic <andrej.mitrovich at gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |andrej.mitrovich at gmail.com


--- Comment #1 from Andrej Mitrovic <andrej.mitrovich at gmail.com> 2013-01-23 11:08:02 PST ---
I don't know whether this is a valid report. The same behavior is in D2, afaik
the field will be initialized with .init, whereas if you introduce a
constructor the compiler expects you to initialize it yourself.

Can anyone with more insight confirm?

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------