[Issue 10320] Warning for old-style operator overloading methods definition

[d-bugmail at puremagic.com]

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10320


monarchdodra at gmail.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |monarchdodra at gmail.com
           See Also|                            |http://d.puremagic.com/issu
                   |                            |es/show_bug.cgi?id=9257


--- Comment #2 from monarchdodra at gmail.com 2013-07-02 04:51:42 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Cases like in this thread show that it's important to give a warning now:
> 
> http://forum.dlang.org/thread/hwfzaysrfxiiumppxwkt@forum.dlang.org

Related (but not duplicate) is also Issue 9257 - [ER] New optional "operator"
keyword to validate magic functions 
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9257

And associated discussion:
http://forum.dlang.org/thread/iubdngjksicwxugrqesc@forum.dlang.org

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------