[Issue 10577] 2.063 Mixin Regression (works with 2.062)
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
Fri Jul 12 10:30:46 PDT 2013
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10577
Puneet Goel <puneet at coverify.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED
Resolution|WORKSFORME |
--- Comment #5 from Puneet Goel <puneet at coverify.org> 2013-07-12 10:30:43 PDT ---
Slightly different test case. But since this too is related, I am re-opening
the same bug. Let me know if I should instead be opening a separate bug for
this.
With this code, I am getting a *spurious* deprecation warning (compiles without
warning with version 2.062).
test.d(37): Deprecation: class test.derived use of test.base.foo() hidden by
derived is deprecated. Use 'alias base.foo foo;' to introduce base class
overload set.
// test.d Code starts here
enum sync;
public template get_sync(size_t I, A...) {
static if(I == A.length) enum bool get_sync = false;
else static if(is(A[I] == sync)) enum bool get_sync = true;
else enum bool get_sync = get_sync!(I+1, A);
}
template add_sync(T, size_t ITER=0) {
static if(ITER == (__traits(derivedMembers, T).length)) {
enum string add_sync = "";
} else {
enum string mem = __traits(derivedMembers, T)[ITER];
enum string add_sync =
"static if(! __traits(isVirtualMethod, " ~ mem ~ ")) {" ~
"mixin(add_sync!(get_sync!(0, __traits(getAttributes, "
~ mem ~ ")), \"" ~ mem ~ "\"));} " ~ add_sync!(T, ITER+1);
}
}
template add_sync(bool A, string M) {
static if(A) {
enum string add_sync = " auto " ~ M[1..$] ~
"() {synchronized(this) return " ~ M ~ ";}";
} else {
enum string add_sync = "";
}
}
abstract class base {
mixin(add_sync!(base));
@sync private bool _bar;
public void foo();
}
class derived: base {
public override void foo() {}
}
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
More information about the Digitalmars-d-bugs
mailing list