[Issue 10267] New: Access checks should be relaxed in some contexts
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
Tue Jun 4 08:57:04 PDT 2013
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10267
Summary: Access checks should be relaxed in some contexts
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: DMD
AssignedTo: nobody at puremagic.com
ReportedBy: andrej.mitrovich at gmail.com
--- Comment #0 from Andrej Mitrovic <andrej.mitrovich at gmail.com> 2013-06-04 08:57:03 PDT ---
Currently we can't filter out function overloads which are non-accessible. As
soon as one of a functions overloads is inaccessible the getOverloads trait
will fail, essentially making the getProtection trait also unusable. For
example:
foo.d:
-----
module foo;
struct S
{
private void x(int) { } // private overload
public void x(float) { } // public overload
}
-----
-----
module test;
import foo;
void main()
{
foreach (member; __traits(allMembers, S))
{
// Error: struct foo.S member x is not accessible
foreach (overload; __traits(getOverloads, S, member))
{
// too late, already errored out
static if (__traits(getProtection, overload) == "public")
{
// ... do something if accessible
}
}
}
}
-----
Some comments:
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/pull/1331#issuecomment-18915427
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/pull/1331#issuecomment-18918513
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
More information about the Digitalmars-d-bugs
mailing list