[Issue 6415] Placement of pure and nothrow for invariant()

[d-bugmail at puremagic.com]

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6415


Walter Bright <bugzilla at digitalmars.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |bugzilla at digitalmars.com


--- Comment #3 from Walter Bright <bugzilla at digitalmars.com> 2013-06-10 10:33:41 PDT ---
I'm not convinced anything needs fixing. Why should:

   invariant() pure nothrow { }

be accepted? After all, as Kenji mentioned, the () is to support old code and
will eventually go away anyway.

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------