[Issue 2573] [Tracker] Data integrity issues

[d-bugmail at puremagic.com]

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2573


Don <clugdbug at yahoo.com.au> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|REOPENED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED


--- Comment #3 from Don <clugdbug at yahoo.com.au> 2013-03-04 04:33:47 PST ---
> There was a discussion back then about having trackers here, and there was no
objection.  If some authority has banned them since, please point me to the
statement.


Walter Bright to d-runtime, 8 Feb
On 2/7/2013 5:22 PM, Brad Roberts wrote:

    Keywords are fully maintained (beyond the point of creation) on the bugs
that utilize that keyword. When there's no open bugs in that category, there's
no bugs with the keyword. Unlike umbrella bugs which would end up being closed
and reopened as bugs are found. There's no clear 'done' with umbrella bugs. See
1001, the stack trace bug, for a classic case of where they're an anti-pattern.


I agree with Brad. Umbrella bugs seem like a great idea, until you use them.
--------

And this one isn't even an umbrella bug, it's a personal gripe list.

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------