[Issue 9347] new std.signals2 implementation

[d-bugmail at puremagic.com]

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9347



--- Comment #6 from jfanatiker at gmx.at 2013-03-16 05:34:52 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> (In reply to comment #4)
> > > Also new implementation doesn't handle threading issue 9606.
> > 
> > Thanks for pointing this out, I will fix it.
> 
> Probably weak references (issue 4151) have to be implemented first.

They would of course be nice and make the signal implementation trivial. But
they are not strictly required, I already tackled the issue in the current
master of my implementation. (Not yet tested, won't even compile, but the basic
concept should work)

Best regards,
Robert

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------