[Issue 9786] Allow [non-member|UFCS] implementation of operators
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
Fri Mar 22 14:58:37 PDT 2013
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9786
Jonathan M Davis <jmdavisProg at gmx.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jmdavisProg at gmx.com
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan M Davis <jmdavisProg at gmx.com> 2013-03-22 14:58:37 PDT ---
Personally, I think that it's a terrible idea to be able to add overloaded
operators to a type with 3rd party code, but with UFCS, it would be even worse,
because as soon as you had a conflict, there would be no way to resolve it.
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
More information about the Digitalmars-d-bugs
mailing list