[Issue 9830] New: Wrong purity inference for a lambda?
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
Fri Mar 29 11:44:44 PDT 2013
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9830
Summary: Wrong purity inference for a lambda?
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: x86
OS/Version: Windows
Status: NEW
Keywords: rejects-valid
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: DMD
AssignedTo: nobody at puremagic.com
ReportedBy: bearophile_hugs at eml.cc
--- Comment #0 from bearophile_hugs at eml.cc 2013-03-29 11:44:42 PDT ---
I think foo2() too can be pure:
void main() {
immutable int x;
int foo1() pure { return x; } // OK
int delegate() pure foo2 = () => x; // error
}
But DMD 2.063alpha gives:
test.d(4): Error: cannot implicitly convert expression (__lambda1) of type int
delegate() nothrow @safe to int delegate() pure
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
More information about the Digitalmars-d-bugs
mailing list