[Issue 11506] pure evaluation should be shortcircuited
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
Tue Nov 12 15:26:52 PST 2013
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11506
bearophile_hugs at eml.cc changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |bearophile_hugs at eml.cc
--- Comment #2 from bearophile_hugs at eml.cc 2013-11-12 15:26:47 PST ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> Also:
>
> pure int fun();
>
> int main(string[] args)
> {
> return fun() + fun();
> }
>
> This program doesn't link, but the generated code reveals that fun() is called
> twice. It should only called once.
If I compile this code with:
dmd -O -release -noboundscheeck temp.d
int fun() pure nothrow { return 0; }
int main() {
return fun + fun;
}
It contains only one call to fun (and add EAX,EAX doubles its result):
_D4temp3funFNaNbZi:
xor EAX,EAX
ret
__Dmain:
L0: push EAX
call near ptr _D4temp3funFNaNbZi
add EAX,EAX
pop ECX
ret
------------------------
But if I remove the nothrow:
int fun() pure { return 0; }
int main() {
return fun + fun;
}
It shows both calls to fun:
_D4temp3funFNaZi:
xor EAX,EAX
ret
__Dmain:
L0: push EAX
call near ptr _D4temp3funFNaZi
push EAX
sub ESP,4
call near ptr _D4temp3funFNaZi
add ESP,4
mov ECX,EAX
pop EAX
add EAX,ECX
pop ECX
ret
The ability to throw is an effect (a side effect) and it can't be ignored. On
the other hand fun takes no arguments, so I think the two calls to fun fun
can't decide to throw or not throw independently. So I think calling fun only
once is OK even if it doesn't have a nothrow annotation.
On the other hand two calls to a a function foo like this:
int foo(in size_t x) pure {
if (x & 1) throw new Exception("");
return 10;
}
int main(in string[] args) {
return fun(args.length) + fun(args.length);
}
Can't be replaced with a single call.
--
Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
More information about the Digitalmars-d-bugs
mailing list