[Issue 4660] Different writeln output for lazy sequences

[via Digitalmars-d-bugs]

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4660

hsteoh at quickfur.ath.cx changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |hsteoh at quickfur.ath.cx

--- Comment #2 from hsteoh at quickfur.ath.cx ---
Current workaround:

writefln("[%(%s; %)]", r);

Is this acceptable?

--