[Issue 11881] -betterC switch suffers from bit rot
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
Wed Jan 8 06:03:25 PST 2014
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11881
yebblies <yebblies at gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |yebblies at gmail.com
--- Comment #9 from yebblies <yebblies at gmail.com> 2014-01-09 01:03:18 EST ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> int 3 might be a better choice, even in kernel mode that's a debugging trap,
> and it is also a one byte instruction on x86 (0xCC). I'd say either do that or
> continue to generate a call to a runtime function, but just use _d_assert
> without the moduleinfo argument instead of _d_assertm.
>
I think still calling _d_assertm is a good idea.
--
Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
More information about the Digitalmars-d-bugs
mailing list