[Issue 4085] Steps toward a static foreach

[d-bugmail at puremagic.com]

https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4085



--- Comment #12 from bearophile_hugs at eml.cc 2014-03-10 01:22:14 PDT ---
This suggests the introduction of a static foreach, so the current ER is not
needed:
http://wiki.dlang.org/DIP57

So I think the static foreach part of this proposal could be considered closed
and replaced by the DIP.

Something like Iota is still needed because static foreach doesn't replace
fully the foreach on tuples and you static foreach(0 .. n) can't use a "step"
value anyway.

On the other hand in the pull requests staticIota was replaces by a toTypeTuple
(https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/pull/1472  but I don't know
its current static) so eventually this whole issue could be closed.

-- 
Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------