[Issue 13448] Class specification misses template classes in base classes list

[via Digitalmars-d-bugs]

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13448

yebblies <yebblies at gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |yebblies at gmail.com

--- Comment #7 from yebblies <yebblies at gmail.com> ---
FWIW, what Kenji said was exactly the reasoning behind using parseBasicType to
parse base class types.  And the grammar must reflect this, otherwise a parser
implemented from the spec will differ from dmd in what is accepted inside a
version(none) block.

--