[Issue 2525] Can't use `override` when implementing abstract base class's interface function

[via Digitalmars-d-bugs]

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2525

--- Comment #8 from Andrej Mitrovic <andrej.mitrovich at gmail.com> ---
Shame on you, Andrej Mitrovic!

I totally support this now, perhaps not so much 'override' as wanting a new
'implements' keyword. But the distinction is so pale, and the real benefit is
really *knowing* that a method is actually part of a base class / interface
API, so I'm now definitely in huge favor of allowing (and perhaps even
*requiring*) override for implementing keywords.

--