[Issue 14498] Poor codegen optimization for ranges
via Digitalmars-d-bugs
digitalmars-d-bugs at puremagic.com
Sat Apr 25 17:41:32 PDT 2015
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14498
safety0ff.bugz <safety0ff.bugz at gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |safety0ff.bugz at gmail.com
--- Comment #2 from safety0ff.bugz <safety0ff.bugz at gmail.com> ---
(In reply to weaselcat from comment #0)
> using the "slow"(aka ranges) version, DMD produces code that is 4 times
> slower. Almost same exact ratios for GDC, so I assume it's due to frontend(?)
>
> LDC seems to optimize it away to almost identical performance between "fast"
> and "slow" version, unsure if it's due to the LLVM optimizations or one of
> their patches to dmd.
>
AFAIK slow version allocates a closure on the heap, perhaps LDC optimizes out
unnecessary closures.
--
More information about the Digitalmars-d-bugs
mailing list