[Issue 14988] Looks like inconsistent error report for the pointless in-contract definition

[via Digitalmars-d-bugs]

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14988

Jacob Carlborg <doob at me.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |doob at me.com

--- Comment #1 from Jacob Carlborg <doob at me.com> ---
I wouldn't say the in-contract is pointless, it's a minimal test case. The
original code of course has code in the in-contract.

--