[Issue 5838] splitter and split names

[via Digitalmars-d-bugs]

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5838

Infiltrator <lt.infiltrator at gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |andrei at erdani.com,
                   |                            |bugzilla at digitalmars.com

--- Comment #3 from Infiltrator <lt.infiltrator at gmail.com> ---
If we were to do this, then the same should be done for join and joiner too. 
So that we end up with join => ejoin[0], split => esplit[0], and joiner => join
and splitter => split.

The problem with this is of course that it would break existing code, so I
highly doubt that it would happen.

I'm CCing Andrei and Walter on this so that they can make a definitive decision
one way or the other.


[0] e for eager.  You said "a for aeger" before; but I think that was just a
spelling error?

--