[Issue 15331] std.json objects should implement opIn_r

[via Digitalmars-d-bugs]

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15331

--- Comment #5 from bb.temp at gmx.com ---

>(In reply to Chris Wright from comment #4)
> > No I wont.
> 
> If you're leaving it to the other person to file the new bug, you could
> perhaps leave it to them to resolve the issue as invalid. There's far less
> chance of a real problem getting lost that way.

I knew what i was doing when closing. You know why ? because of this:
http://forum.dlang.org/thread/udfyyltwmzcsskfmxvfs@forum.dlang.org

> 
> > It's rather up to you, "next time" to take a moment to ask for a clarification
> 
> First, I'm choosing to spend my time to write up a bug report to improve D.
> If you are interested in the success of D, that goal would be poorly served
> by adding roadblocks to others attempting to improve it -- unless filtering
> out erroneous bugs has already proven onerous. Has it? If so, I'll gladly
> volunteer a couple hours a week toward verifying and reproducing bugs so
> that others who are less attached to D can do less legwork up front.

You see a roadblock while I give the opportunity to improve yourself.

> Second, you're asking me to take hours of wall time, not a moment. It means
> I have to make a newsgroup post, which is exactly as much work as filing a
> bug, then remember to go back to the newsgroup after a few hours, then, if
> nobody's responded, file a bug. That remembering to file a bug part is
> nontrivial; it means I'll fail to report a decent fraction of issues I
> identify. (And if someone responded on the newsgroup after I submitted an
> issue, you would likely still be snippy at me, leaving me with a dilemma
> about how long to wait between asking about a problem and filing the bug.)

By experience I know it's fast, answers come fast in dlang.lean. By experience
I also know that the simple fact to formulate a problem better (so that
everybody can understand it) helps to find the answer. We 've all experienced
that.

> Third, the main thrust of your newsgroup argument was that you found that an
> issue had already been reported.

No no no, you don't get my example related to the Q asked about partially
instantiated templates. In this particular case, yes it would have been a
duplicate, but it could also be a programming error from mine. This is the
whole point of my argumentation. Intead of being a bit humble and to ask
yourself if the error could come from you, the first thing you do is to suspect
a bug in DMD or Phobos. That's a characterized bias (Congruence bias).

> Fourth, I frequently see Andrei and Walter telling people to file bugs for
> issues rather than reporting them to the newsgroup. I'm going with their
> suggestions rather than yours.

I was not suggesting anyone to report bugs in the NG, I was suggesting to ask
how to use this or that rather than considering that if you don't manage to do
this or that because something it's a bug.

But finally the real problem here is that you can't stand my interference, can
you ?

--