[Issue 17213] [REG2.072] take address of ref return value @safe

[via Digitalmars-d-bugs]

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17213

Jack Stouffer <jack at jackstouffer.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |jack at jackstouffer.com

--- Comment #2 from Jack Stouffer <jack at jackstouffer.com> ---
(In reply to hsteoh from comment #1)
> Seems to be a true (and breaking!) limitation of DIP1000.

The idea of having a -dip1000 switch was to make it so normal code won't be hit
with changes like this. The problem is that for some reason we're breaking user
code that has nothing to do with dip1000. Which, without a deprecation cycle,
is unacceptable.

--