[Issue 8338] Unqual's documentation doesn't reflect its behavior on types with indirections

[d-bugmail at puremagic.com]

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8338

Timoses <timosesu at gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |timosesu at gmail.com

--- Comment #7 from Timoses <timosesu at gmail.com> ---
(In reply to Peter Alexander from comment #5)
> Are there actually any use cases for stripping all qualifiers? If there are
> no use cases then there is no point adding it. I can't think of any.

Please see in issue 3567 for an example use case where a full Unqual is
required:
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3567#c5

--