[Issue 19221] New: "std.file.copy" now completely ignores the "PreserveAttributes.no" argument on Windows
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
Tue Sep 4 21:45:14 UTC 2018
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19221
Issue ID: 19221
Summary: "std.file.copy" now completely ignores the
"PreserveAttributes.no" argument on Windows
Product: D
Version: D2
Hardware: All
OS: Windows
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P1
Component: phobos
Assignee: nobody at puremagic.com
Reporter: bugzilla at digitalmars.com
On 04/09/2018 10:27 PM, Ecstatic Coder wrote:
> On Tuesday, 4 September 2018 at 09:56:13 UTC, rikki cattermole wrote:
>> On 04/09/2018 9:40 PM, Ecstatic Coder wrote:
>>> But it seems that the latest version of "std.file.copy" now completely ignores the "PreserveAttributes.no" argument on Windows, which made recent Windows builds of Resync fail on read-only files.
>>
>> What???
>>
>> There is nothing in the changelog between 2.080.0 and 2.082.0 for changes to std.file.
>>
>> Version from July 2017[0]. Version from 2.082.0[1]. They look the same to me.
>>
>> [0] https://github.com/dlang/phobos/blob/d8959320e0c47a1861e32bbbf6a3ba30a019798e/std/file.d#L3430
>> [1] https://github.com/dlang/phobos/blob/v2.082.0/std/file.d#L4216
>
> Mayb I'm wrong, but what I can say is that I've recently updated DMD and compiled a windows build of Resync, and that I *HAD* to make Windows-specific code that removes the "read-only" attributes only on Windows.
>
> attributes = source_file_path.getAttributes();
> source_file_path.getTimes( access_time, modification_time );
>
> version ( Windows )
> {
> if ( target_file_path.exists() )
> {
> target_file_path.setAttributes( attributes & ~1 );
> }
>
> source_file_path.copy( target_file_path, PreserveAttributes.no );
> target_file_path.setAttributes( attributes & ~1 );
> target_file_path.setTimes( access_time, modification_time );
> target_file_path.setAttributes( attributes );
> }
> else
> {
> if ( target_file_path.exists() )
> {
> target_file_path.setAttributes( 511 );
> }
>
> source_file_path.copy( target_file_path, PreserveAttributes.no );
> target_file_path.setAttributes( attributes );
> target_file_path.setTimes( access_time, modification_time );
> }
>
> Honestly I don't see why I have to make this ugly fix on Windows, while the Linux version has always worked fine on read-only files.
Hang on a second.
assert(preserve == Yes.preserveAttributes);
Something is smelling an awful lot here.
Up to Windows 7 CopyFileW which is used for Windows didn't copy the attributes
over[0] but it does now.
This is a bug on our end, which should include a fallback to copying manually
the file contents over.
[0]
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/desktop/api/winbase/nf-winbase-copyfilew
--
More information about the Digitalmars-d-bugs
mailing list