[Issue 19904] move semantics fail through the `emplace` pipeline
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
Mon May 27 22:07:06 UTC 2019
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19904
Andrei Alexandrescu <andrei at erdani.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |andrei at erdani.com
--- Comment #5 from Andrei Alexandrescu <andrei at erdani.com> ---
First, we have a problem with identifying the ref vs the non-ref instantiation.
This should compile and doesn't:
void fun(T)(auto ref T x) {
static if (is(x == ref)) { ... }
}
This does compile, but prints the wrong thing (non ref for both cases):
import std.stdio;
void fun(T)(auto ref T x) {
pragma(msg, __PRETTY_FUNCTION__);
static if (is(__traits(isRef, x))) { writeln("ref: ", x); }
else { writeln("non ref: ", x); }
}
void main() {
int a;
fun(a);
fun(42);
}
Should definitely be its own bug, so I just submitted
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19906.
This doesn't compile:
void fun(T)(auto ref T x) {
pragma(msg, __PRETTY_FUNCTION__);
static if (__traits(getParameterStorageClasses, fun, 0)[0] == "ref") {
writeln("ref: ", x); }
else { writeln("non ref: ", x); }
}
The error message suggests you can't get access to the function name from
within the function definition. This doesn't same to compile for the same
reason:
void fun(T)(auto ref T x) {
import std.traits;
pragma(msg, __PRETTY_FUNCTION__);
static if (ParameterStorageClassTuple!fun[0] == ParameterStorageClass.ref_)
{ writeln("ref: ", x); }
else { writeln("non ref: ", x); }
}
Detecting ref-ness should be easily doable from within the instantiation.
That's the first problem to tackle.
--
More information about the Digitalmars-d-bugs
mailing list