[Issue 4425] More bells & whistles for bitfields
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
Sat Jan 9 22:39:15 UTC 2021
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4425
Mathias LANG <pro.mathias.lang at gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
CC| |pro.mathias.lang at gmail.com
Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
--- Comment #5 from Mathias LANG <pro.mathias.lang at gmail.com> ---
I don't see any actionable item here, just some ideas.
The situation have changed quite a bit since this issue was created: In
particular, `static immutable` field do not occupy space in aggregates anymore,
so the idea of having a CT-known `immutable` field means that it would likely
be decoupled from the runtime one. As a result, closing as WONTFIX.
--
More information about the Digitalmars-d-bugs
mailing list