[Issue 4425] More bells & whistles for bitfields

d-bugmail at puremagic.com d-bugmail at puremagic.com
Sat Jan 9 22:39:15 UTC 2021


https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4425

Mathias LANG <pro.mathias.lang at gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |RESOLVED
                 CC|                            |pro.mathias.lang at gmail.com
         Resolution|---                         |WONTFIX

--- Comment #5 from Mathias LANG <pro.mathias.lang at gmail.com> ---
I don't see any actionable item here, just some ideas.
The situation have changed quite a bit since this issue was created: In
particular, `static immutable` field do not occupy space in aggregates anymore,
so  the idea of having a CT-known `immutable` field means that it would likely
be decoupled from the runtime one. As a result, closing as WONTFIX.

--


More information about the Digitalmars-d-bugs mailing list