[Issue 3345] Static and nonstatic methods with the same name should be allowed

[d-bugmail at puremagic.com]

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3345

--- Comment #12 from Max Samukha <maxsamukha at gmail.com> ---
(In reply to Basile-z from comment #11)

> I'm not 100% sure of what I will say but I would say that it's not really
> "broken", rather that "it's pragmatically adapted to closures". You see, a
> kind of tradeoff.

I understand it was an attempt at pragmatism, but the type system is still
broken.

struct S {
    void foo() {
        x = 1;
    }

    int x;
}

void main() {
    void function() f = &S.foo; // this means "broken"
    f(); // bang
}

--