The D Programming Language - Digitalmars-d-bugs

May 2022 Archives by author

• Messages sorted by: [ thread ] [ subject ] [ date ]
• More info on this list...

Starting: Sun May 1 02:02:30 UTC 2022
Ending: Tue May 31 14:27:34 UTC 2022
Messages: 448

• [Issue 23075] New: global const string definitions should go in readonly segment   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23075] global const string definitions should go in readonly segment   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23075] global const string definitions should go in readonly segment   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23075] global const string definitions should go in readonly segment   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23057] importC: dmd segfault on invalid syntax   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23057] importC: dmd segfault on invalid syntax   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22981] Another forward reference bug involving a string mixin   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22974] importC: D name mangling applied to extern variable inside function   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22070] importC: Error: string/array literal is not an lvalue   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22877] importC: wrong sizeof for string literal   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23076] New: [ICE][backend][REG] Crash with -inline -O   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23076] [ICE][backend][REG] Crash with -inline -O   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23056] importC: dmd asserts for missing return statement in CTFE function   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23045] importC: casted function type is missing extern(C)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23077] New: codegen cannot generage XMM load/store for optimized operation that uses byte/short/...   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23077] codegen cannot generage XMM load/store for optimized operation that uses byte/short/...   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22070] importC: Error: string/array literal is not an lvalue   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22877] importC: wrong sizeof for string literal   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23077] codegen cannot generage XMM load/store for optimized operation that uses byte/short/...   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23057] importC: dmd segfault on invalid syntax   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23078] New: importC: generated code shouldn't depend on druntime   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23078] importC: generated code shouldn't depend on druntime   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23046] [REG][CODEGEN] __simd(XMM.LODLPS) bad codegen   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23079] New: [dip1000] be more lenient when taking address of `ref` return   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23079] [dip1000] be more lenient when taking address of `ref` return   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22911] dtoh: make include directives sorted for generated headers   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23080] New: Mach-O: TLS globals misaligned   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23080] Mach-O: TLS globals misaligned   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23081] New: align(N) attribute ignored for ClassDeclarations   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 16508] Alignment of class members is not respected. Affects new, scoped and classInstanceAlignment.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23081] align(N) attribute ignored for ClassDeclarations   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 17374] Improve inferred attribute error message   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23082] New: stringof of template alias overloaded with function accessed by trait: segfault.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23082] stringof of template alias overloaded with function accessed by trait: segfault.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23083] New: .tupleof on static array rvalue evaluates expression multiple times   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23082] stringof of template alias overloaded with function accessed by trait: segfault.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23083] .tupleof on static array rvalue evaluates expression multiple times   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23046] [REG][CODEGEN] __simd(XMM.LODLPS) bad codegen   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23051] OpenBSD: Build broken on 2.100.0-beta.1 due to the inout attribute no longer implying the return attribute   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23084] New: [REG 2.080] dmd: src/dmd/backend/cgxmm.d:816: Assertion `0' failed.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23084] [REG 2.080] dmd: src/dmd/backend/cgxmm.d:816: Assertion `0' failed.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23084] [REG 2.080] dmd: src/dmd/backend/cgxmm.d:816: Assertion `0' failed.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23084] [REG 2.080] dmd: src/dmd/backend/cgxmm.d:816: Assertion `0' failed.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23084] [REG 2.080] dmd: src/dmd/backend/cgxmm.d:816: Assertion `0' failed.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23084] [REG 2.080] dmd: src/dmd/backend/cgxmm.d:816: Assertion `0' failed.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23077] codegen cannot generage XMM load/store for optimized operation that uses byte/short/...   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23084] [REG 2.080] dmd: src/dmd/backend/cgxmm.d:816: Assertion `0' failed.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23084] [REG 2.080] dmd: src/dmd/backend/cgxmm.d:816: Assertion `0' failed.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23084] [REG 2.080] dmd: src/dmd/backend/cgxmm.d:816: Assertion `0' failed.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23077] codegen cannot generage XMM load/store for optimized operation that uses byte/short/...   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23077] codegen cannot generage XMM load/store for optimized operation that uses byte/short/...   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23084] [REG 2.080] dmd: src/dmd/backend/cgxmm.d:816: Assertion `0' failed.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23085] New: [ICE] dmd: src/dmd/backend/cod1.d:1933: Assertion `retregs & BYTEREGS' failed.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23077] codegen cannot generage XMM load/store for optimized operation that uses byte/short/...   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23085] [ICE] dmd: src/dmd/backend/cod1.d:1933: Assertion `retregs & BYTEREGS' failed.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23085] [ICE] dmd: src/dmd/backend/cod1.d:1933: Assertion `retregs & BYTEREGS' failed.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23084] [REG 2.080] dmd: src/dmd/backend/cgxmm.d:816: Assertion `0' failed.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23084] [REG 2.080] dmd: src/dmd/backend/cgxmm.d:816: Assertion `0' failed.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23085] [ICE] dmd: src/dmd/backend/cod1.d:1933: Assertion `retregs & BYTEREGS' failed.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23085] [ICE] dmd: src/dmd/backend/cod1.d:1933: Assertion `retregs & BYTEREGS' failed.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23086] New: spurious case of `expression has no effect` message   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23086] spurious case of `expression has no effect` message   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23087] New: getLinkage trait regression for overloads with v2.100.0-rc.1   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23087] getLinkage trait regression for overloads with v2.100.0-rc.1   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23086] spurious case of `expression has no effect` message   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23087] getLinkage trait regression for overloads with v2.100.0-rc.1   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23086] spurious case of `expression has no effect` message   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23088] New: spurious case of "`expression`" has no effect   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23087] getLinkage trait regression for overloads with v2.100.0-rc.1   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23086] spurious case of `expression has no effect` message   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23087] getLinkage trait regression for overloads with v2.100.0-rc.1   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23088] spurious case of "`expression` has no effect"   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23089] New: Linkage-related ICE regression in v2.100.0-rc.1   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23089] Linkage-related ICE regression in v2.100.0-rc.1   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23089] Linkage-related ICE regression in v2.100.0-rc.1   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23084] [REG 2.080] dmd: src/dmd/backend/cgxmm.d:816: Assertion `0' failed.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23088] spurious case of "`expression` has no effect"   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23083] .tupleof on static array rvalue evaluates expression multiple times   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23090] New: Allocators should not use NullAllocator as a sentinel type   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23089] Linkage-related ICE regression in v2.100.0-rc.1   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20670] immutable template specialization pattern matches immutable struct, strips immutable   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23091] New: importC: string literals no longer convert to D string type   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23030] importC: errors using typedef struct after first use as const   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21416] betterC mode program with C++ interface fails to link   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23092] New: Cannot cross-compile from Posix to Windows   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23089] Linkage-related ICE regression in v2.100.0-rc.1   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23042] -betterC still includes RTInfo   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20619] ddox documentation "auto auto" return values   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23093] New: DDOC: display detailed documentation of public imports   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23094] New: std.range.generate calls fun more than necessary   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23094] std.range.generate calls fun more than necessary   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22974] importC: D name mangling applied to extern variable inside function   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23037] importC: type with only type-qualifier doesn't work   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23038] importC: sizeof inside struct has struct members in scope   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23039] importC: declaration with array length has itself in scope   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23044] importC: comma expression with function call parsed as declaration   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23045] importC: casted function type is missing extern(C)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23047] [ICE][SIMD] Do not SROA vector types   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23056] importC: dmd asserts for missing return statement in CTFE function   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23057] importC: dmd segfault on invalid syntax   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23095] New: taggedPointer accessors are not scope   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23077] codegen cannot generage XMM load/store for optimized operation that uses byte/short/...   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23077] codegen cannot generage XMM load/store for optimized operation that uses byte/short/...   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23084] [REG 2.080] dmd: src/dmd/backend/cgxmm.d:816: Assertion `0' failed.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23066] importC: cannot initialize char array with string literal of different length   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23075] global const string definitions should go in readonly segment   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23077] codegen cannot generage XMM load/store for optimized operation that uses byte/short/...   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23085] [ICE] dmd: src/dmd/backend/cod1.d:1933: Assertion `retregs & BYTEREGS' failed.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23042] -betterC still includes RTInfo   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23096] New: return auto ref does wrongly inferred with member function   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23096] return auto ref does wrongly inferred with member function   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 19587] std.range.generate's range calls its argument one time too many   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23094] std.range.generate calls fun more than necessary   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 19587] std.range.generate's range calls its argument one time too many   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23077] codegen cannot generage XMM load/store for optimized operation that uses byte/short/...   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23077] codegen cannot generage XMM load/store for optimized operation that uses byte/short/...   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23085] [ICE] dmd: src/dmd/backend/cod1.d:1933: Assertion `retregs & BYTEREGS' failed.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23095] taggedPointer accessors are not scope   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23088] spurious case of "`expression` has no effect"   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20670] immutable template specialization pattern matches immutable struct, strips immutable   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22070] importC: Error: string/array literal is not an lvalue   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22877] importC: wrong sizeof for string literal   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 17374] Improve inferred attribute error message   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23058] importC: cannot take address inside multi-dimensional array at compile time   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23012] importC: asm label to set symbol name not applied from forward declaration   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23097] New: [REG 2.100] ArrayIndexError at src/dmd/mtype.d(4767): index [18446744073709551615] is out of bounds for array of length 0   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23097] [REG 2.100] ArrayIndexError at src/dmd/mtype.d(4767): index [18446744073709551615] is out of bounds for array of length 0   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23097] [REG 2.100] ArrayIndexError at src/dmd/mtype.d(4767): index [18446744073709551615] is out of bounds for array of length 0   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23098] New: array literal to scope inout parameter not allowed in safe code   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23098] array literal to scope inout parameter not allowed in safe code   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23099] New: DMD generates dangerous code on array literals usage inside functions   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23097] [REG 2.100] ArrayIndexError at src/dmd/mtype.d(4767): index [18446744073709551615] is out of bounds for array of length 0   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23018] importC: syntax error for sizeof with postfix operator on parenthesized expression   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23099] DMD generates dangerous code on array literals usage inside functions   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23099] DMD generates dangerous code on array literals usage inside functions   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23098] array literal to scope inout parameter not allowed in safe code   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21416] betterC mode program with C++ interface fails to link   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23097] [REG 2.100] ArrayIndexError at src/dmd/mtype.d(4767): index [18446744073709551615] is out of bounds for array of length 0   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23100] New: empty array literal passed to scope param not 'falsey' anymore   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23100] empty array literal passed to scope param not 'falsey' anymore   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23097] [REG 2.100] ArrayIndexError at src/dmd/mtype.d(4767): index [18446744073709551615] is out of bounds for array of length 0   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23101] New: [std.sumtype] canMatch does not account ref   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23101] [std.sumtype] canMatch does not account ref   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23101] [std.sumtype] canMatch does not account ref   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20670] immutable template specialization pattern matches immutable struct, strips immutable   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 18559] std.math.* should stop using `real` overloads by default   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23079] [dip1000] be more lenient when taking address of `ref` return   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23102] New: pinholeopt, "Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)"   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23102] pinholeopt, "Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)"   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23102] pinholeopt, "Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)"   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23102] pinholeopt, "Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)"   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23102] pinholeopt, "Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)"   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23101] [std.sumtype] canMatch does not account ref   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23058] importC: cannot take address inside multi-dimensional array at compile time   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23067] importC: offsetof macro assumes size_t is defined   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23067] importC: offsetof macro assumes size_t is defined   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23103] New: static initialization of associative arrays is not implemented   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23067] importC: offsetof macro assumes size_t is defined   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23091] importC: string literals no longer convert to D string type   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23055] importC: using compound-literal array as pointer in CTFE gives 'dereference of invalid pointer'   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23058] importC: cannot take address inside multi-dimensional array at compile time   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23054] importC: struct compound-literal assigned by pointer has wrong storage duration   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23101] [std.sumtype] canMatch does not account ref   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23104] New: case where use of mixin() is rejected but use of the mixin content as code does   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23104] case where use of mixin() is rejected but use of the mixin content as code is not   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23104] case where use of mixin() is rejected but use of the mixin content as code is not   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23104] case where use of mixin() is rejected but use of the mixin content as code is not   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23105] New: `__trait(getMember)` and `mixin()` of the same code as a string behaves differently   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23105] `__trait(getMember)` and `mixin()` of the same code as a string behaves differently   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23102] pinholeopt, "Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)"   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23105] `__trait(getMember)` and `mixin()` of the same code as a string behave differently   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23102] pinholeopt, "Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)"   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23102] pinholeopt, "Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)"   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23106] New: the simple main() leaks 96 bytes   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20670] immutable template specialization pattern matches immutable struct, strips immutable   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23105] `__trait(getMember)` and `mixin()` of the same code as a string behave differently   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20670] immutable template specialization pattern matches immutable struct, strips immutable   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20670] immutable template specialization pattern matches immutable struct, strips immutable   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23054] importC: struct compound-literal assigned by pointer has wrong storage duration   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23054] importC: struct compound-literal assigned by pointer has wrong storage duration   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23103] static initialization of associative arrays is not implemented   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20670] immutable template specialization pattern matches immutable struct, strips immutable   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22427] betterC: casting an array causes linker error in string comparison.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23105] `__trait(getMember)` and `mixin()` of the same code as a string behave differently   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23105] `__trait(getMember)` and `mixin()` of the same code as a string behave differently   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23105] `__trait(getMember)` and `mixin()` of the same code as a string behave differently   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 16508] Alignment of class members is not respected. Affects new, scoped and classInstanceAlignment.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23081] align(N) attribute ignored for ClassDeclarations   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23107] New: dtor incorrectly skipped   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23107] dtor incorrectly skipped   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23108] New: ICE: AssertError at src/dmd/clone.d(567): Assertion failure   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23109] New: ICE: AssertError at src/dmd/dclass.d(449): Assertion failure   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23109] ICE: AssertError at src/dmd/dclass.d(449): Assertion failure   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23109] ICE: AssertError at src/dmd/dclass.d(449): Assertion failure   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23108] ICE: AssertError at src/dmd/clone.d(567): Assertion failure   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 16508] Alignment of class members is not respected. Affects new, scoped and classInstanceAlignment.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 16508] Alignment of class members is not respected. Affects new, scoped and classInstanceAlignment.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 16575] [ICE] extern(C++) function with D specific types   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21206] ICE when argument or return value is string type in extern(C++) functions   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 16575] [ICE] extern(C++) function with D specific types   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21314] ICE on extern(c++) static class variables   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23109] ICE: AssertError at src/dmd/dclass.d(449): Assertion failure   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23108] ICE: AssertError at src/dmd/clone.d(567): Assertion failure   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23107] dtor incorrectly skipped   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 16575] [ICE] extern(C++) function with D specific types   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21314] ICE on extern(c++) static class variables   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 16575] [ICE] extern(C++) function with D specific types   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 16508] Alignment of class members is not respected. Affects new, scoped and classInstanceAlignment.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23108] ICE: AssertError at src/dmd/clone.d(567): Assertion failure   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 16508] Alignment of class members is not respected. Affects new, scoped and classInstanceAlignment.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23054] importC: struct compound-literal assigned by pointer has wrong storage duration   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23109] ICE: AssertError at src/dmd/dclass.d(449): Assertion failure   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20670] immutable template specialization pattern matches immutable struct, strips immutable   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20670] immutable template specialization pattern matches immutable struct, strips immutable   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20670] immutable template specialization pattern matches immutable struct, strips immutable   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20670] immutable template specialization pattern matches immutable struct, strips immutable   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20670] immutable template specialization pattern matches immutable struct, strips immutable   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20670] immutable template specialization pattern matches immutable struct, strips immutable   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20670] immutable template specialization pattern matches immutable struct, strips immutable   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20670] immutable template specialization pattern matches immutable struct, strips immutable   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 12885] const union wrongly converts implicitly to mutable   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23110] New: src/dmd/link.d tries to use MSVC linker on Windows when MinGW is used   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20670] immutable template specialization pattern matches immutable struct, strips immutable   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21314] ICE on extern(c++) static class variables   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23066] importC: cannot initialize char array with string literal of different length   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23075] global const string definitions should go in readonly segment   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23110] src/dmd/link.d tries to use MSVC linker on Windows when MinGW is used   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23110] src/dmd/link.d tries to use MSVC linker on Windows when MinGW is used   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22653] @safe @nogc delegate should allocate but doesn't, calls member function on dead object   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23111] New: stack-allocated array escapes in @safe code   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23111] stack-allocated array escapes in @safe code   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23100] empty array literal passed to scope param not 'falsey' anymore   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23112] New: code passes @nogc, allocates anyway   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23112] code passes @nogc, allocates anyway   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 16575] [ICE] extern(C++) function with D specific types   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21314] ICE on extern(c++) static class variables   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23112] code passes @nogc, allocates anyway   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23111] stack-allocated array escapes in @safe code   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23113] New: Bug in CTFE initialization of redBlackTree?   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23114] New: Can't use noreturn operand in arithmetic expression   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23115] New: [REG 2.100] AssertError at src/dmd/dtemplate.d(7397): can only re-append from non-root to root module   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23115] [REG 2.100] AssertError at src/dmd/dtemplate.d(7397): can only re-append from non-root to root module   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23115] [REG 2.100] AssertError at src/dmd/dtemplate.d(7397): can only re-append from non-root to root module   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22674] ImportC: compatible types declared in different translation units are not treated equivalent in D.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23116] New: foreach with opApply infer ref when opApply delegate is templated   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23116] foreach with opApply infer ref when opApply delegate is templated   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23116] foreach with opApply infer ref when opApply delegate is templated   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23116] foreach with opApply infer ref when opApply delegate is templated   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23116] foreach with opApply infer ref when opApply delegate is templated   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22674] ImportC: compatible types declared in different translation units are not treated equivalent in D.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22674] ImportC: compatible types declared in different translation units are not treated equivalent in D.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22674] ImportC: compatible types declared in different translation units are not treated equivalent in D.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23116] foreach with opApply infer ref when opApply delegate is templated   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22674] ImportC: compatible types declared in different translation units are not treated equivalent in D.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23117] New: crash in @safe code after CTFE   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23117] crash in @safe code after CTFE   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23117] crash in @safe code after CTFE   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23117] crash in @safe code after CTFE   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23118] New: UFCS not working for function level templates   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23118] UFCS not working for function level templates   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23118] UFCS not working for function level templates   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23118] UFCS not working for function level templates   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23119] New: Compiling glui example results in linker error   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23119] Compiling glui example results in linker error   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23119] Compiling glui example results in linker error   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23119] Compiling glui example results in linker error   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23119] Compiling glui example results in linker error   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23114] Can't use noreturn operand in arithmetic expression   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23114] Can't use noreturn operand in arithmetic expression   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22108] DIP1000 parameter mistakenly interpreted as return scope instead of scope   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23018] importC: syntax error for sizeof with postfix operator on parenthesized expression   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20838] on modern (x86_64) CPUs, dmd emit cmpxchg8b instead of CMPXCHG16B   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20838] on modern (x86_64) CPUs, dmd emit cmpxchg8b instead of CMPXCHG16B   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23120] New: dmd illegal instruction throw expression   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23121] New: Linux release archives should adhere to filesystem hierarchy standard   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23122] New: enum member UDAs semantics are not checked properly   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20838] on modern (x86_64) CPUs, dmd emit cmpxchg8b instead of CMPXCHG16B   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23123] New: -vasm wrong result for cmpxchg16b   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23123] -vasm wrong result for cmpxchg16b   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 19551] corrupt ELF library when using pragma(crt_constructor)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23102] pinholeopt, "Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)"   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 19551] corrupt ELF library when using pragma(crt_constructor)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23102] pinholeopt, "Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)"   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23102] pinholeopt, "Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)"   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21892] deprecation warning on reflection should be suppressed or at least suppressable   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23123] -vasm wrong result for cmpxchg16b   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23124] New: [dip1000] scope and return should not be inferred for @trusted function   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6952] Static Linking on Linux   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 12885] const union wrongly converts implicitly to mutable   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23125] New: Missing const in IIDFromString() in core.sys.windows.objbase.d   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23012] importC: asm label to set symbol name not applied from forward declaration   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22626] Can't use synchronized member functions with -nosharedaccess   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23120] dmd illegal instruction throw expression   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 12885] const union wrongly converts implicitly to mutable   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22865] __traits(compiles) affects inferrence of attributes   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23126] New: wrong result of integer division in presence of assert within conditional operator expression   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23126] wrong result of integer division in presence of assert within conditional operator expression   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23127] New: @safe inference seems to depend on semantic analysis order   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23127] @safe inference seems to depend on semantic analysis order   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23127] @safe inference seems to depend on semantic analysis order   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23127] @safe inference seems to depend on semantic analysis order   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23127] @safe inference seems to depend on semantic analysis order   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22865] __traits(compiles) affects inferrence of attributes   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23082] stringof of template alias overloaded with function accessed by trait: segfault.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23082] stringof of template alias overloaded with function accessed by trait: segfault.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23128] New: Attributes inference breaks down with cycles   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23129] New: object.destroy doesn't consider initialize=false on D classes   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23129] object.destroy doesn't consider initialize=false on D classes   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23129] object.destroy doesn't consider initialize=false on D classes   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 17898] Segfault in compile with -deps and -unittest   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 19377] VisualStudio build is very slow   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 19528] asm ptoblem   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23130] New: Inline asm lets you mov to half a variable.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 19528] asm ptoblem   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23130] Inline asm lets you mov to half a variable.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22664] Disassembler mistakes rdtscp for invlpg ECX   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22937] identity comparison of strings / struct literals not constant folded   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23131] New: With -vasm all the X87 instructions are printed wrong.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22664] Disassembler mistakes rdtscp for invlpg ECX   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22937] identity comparison of strings / struct literals not constant folded   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23132] New: "cannot access frame pointer" comparing two ranges for equality from v2.099.0   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23132] "cannot access frame pointer" comparing two ranges for equality from v2.099.0   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23133] New: Timon's list of enhancement requests   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23061] Exceptions cannot be caught by catch statement in static build   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 16508] Alignment of class members is not respected. Affects new, scoped and classInstanceAlignment.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22986] Phobos cannot be compiled with dip1008   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 1983] Delegates violate const   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2043] Closure outer variables in nested blocks are not allocated/instantiated correctly: should have multiple instances but only have one.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 15129] std.parallelism.parallel doesn't enforce shared-correctness   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 1983] Delegates violate const   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2573] [Tracker] Data integrity issues   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23113] Bug in CTFE initialization of redBlackTree?   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 1983] Delegates violate const   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 15129] std.parallelism.parallel doesn't enforce shared-correctness   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2573] [Tracker] Data integrity issues   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2043] Closure outer variables in nested blocks are not allocated/instantiated correctly: should have multiple instances but only have one.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2043] Closure outer variables in nested blocks are not allocated/instantiated correctly: should have multiple instances but only have one.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2043] Closure outer variables in nested blocks are not allocated/instantiated correctly: should have multiple instances but only have one.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23061] Exceptions cannot be caught by catch statement in static build   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2043] Closure outer variables in nested blocks are not allocated/instantiated correctly: should have multiple instances but only have one.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21929] delegates capture do not respect scoping   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 12118] Modify immutable data using throw   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21929] delegates capture do not respect scoping   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 15129] std.parallelism.parallel doesn't enforce shared-correctness   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 1983] Delegates violate const   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2573] [Tracker] Data integrity issues   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21929] delegates capture do not respect scoping   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23134] New: Mutate variable through immutable pointer   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 16095] a delegate can mutate immutable data and break shared / non-shared enforcements   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23134] Mutate variable through immutable pointer   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23135] New: Covariance rules for C++ member functions mismatch D   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23135] Covariance rules for C++ member functions mismatch D   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22351] extern(C++) function contravariant in D, but not C++   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23135] Covariance rules for C++ member functions mismatch D   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 12919] disallow implicit signed/unsigned integer conversions   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23136] New: closure in a loop should hold distinct values for each iteration   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23136] closure in a loop should hold distinct values for each iteration   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2043] Closure outer variables in nested blocks are not allocated/instantiated correctly: should have multiple instances but only have one.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23136] closure in a loop should hold distinct values for each iteration   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2043] Closure outer variables in nested blocks are not allocated/instantiated correctly: should have multiple instances but only have one.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22427] betterC: casting an array causes linker error in string comparison.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23134] Mutate variable through immutable pointer   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23137] New: Matrix initialization at global scope   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23137] Matrix initialization at global scope   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23138] New: Overrides of member functions of an inherited class ignores attribute "downcast"   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23137] Matrix initialization at global scope   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23137] Matrix init rejected in module scope but accepted at function scope   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23137] Matrix init rejected in module scope but accepted at function scope   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23135] Covariance rules for C++ member functions mismatch D   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23138] Overrides of member functions of an inherited class ignores attribute "downcast"   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23139] New: object files containing several big static initializers require --no-relax to link   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23139] object files containing several big static initializers require --no-relax to link   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23139] object files containing several big static initializers require --no-relax to link   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23139] object files containing several big static initializers require --no-relax to link   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23139] object files containing several big static initializers require --no-relax to link   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22351] extern(C++) function contravariant in D, but not C++   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23135] Covariance rules for C++ member functions mismatch D   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20193] Using shared in the class declaration does not make the class implicitly shared like for a struct   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22515] Aggregate definition with qualifiers has inconsistencies between structs and classes   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23140] New: Array!T where T is a shared class no longer works   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 12879] Wrong line number for run-time array cast misalignment error   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 12879] Wrong line number for run-time array cast misalignment error   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 12879] Wrong line number for run-time array cast misalignment error   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23141] New: Improve -release switch description   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 17374] Improve inferred attribute error message   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 17599] Abbreviate too long type definitions in error messages   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23138] Overrides of member functions of an inherited class ignores attribute "downcast"   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23141] Improve -release switch description   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11094] Disuniform error messages with overloaded + and ^ operators   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22351] extern(C++) function contravariant in D, but not C++   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23135] Covariance rules for C++ member functions mismatch D   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23142] New: Scope should not apply to unittests   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23114] Can't use noreturn operand in arithmetic expression   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23141] Improve -release switch description   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23088] spurious case of "`expression` has no effect"   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23114] Can't use noreturn operand in arithmetic expression   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23143] New: ImportC: forward enum declarations result in uninformative errors   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23143] ImportC: forward enum declarations need to be supported   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22902] dmd 2.099 regression: unittest -checkaction=context and import std.regex causes link error   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23144] New: False circular reference error when the field name of a struct or class is the same as the type name   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23145] New: Stack allocation of scope variables defeats @safe   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23145] Stack allocation of scope variables defeats @safe   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23144] False circular reference error when the field name of a struct or class is the same as the type name   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23146] New: bounds checking is still done in @system functions   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23146] bounds checking is still done in @system functions   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23144] False circular reference error when the field name of a struct or class is the same as the type name   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23145] Stack allocation of scope variables defeats @safe   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23076] [ICE][backend][REG] Crash with -inline -O   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 13713] core.atomic should use compiler intrinsics   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 13713] core.atomic should use compiler intrinsics   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23147] New: Integer division may cause undefined behavior in @safe code   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23147] Integer division may cause undefined behavior in @safe code   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23147] Integer division may cause undefined behavior in @safe code   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 17448] Move semantics cause memory corruption and cryptic bugs   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23076] [ICE][backend][REG] Crash with -inline -O   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23076] SIMD assert fail with -inline -O converting float to short   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23076] SIMD assert fail with -inline -O converting float to short   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23145] Stack allocation of scope new variables defeats @safe   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23145] Stack allocation of scope new variables defeats @safe   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23076] SIMD assert fail with -inline -O converting float to short   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23142] Scope should not apply to unittests   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 17448] Move semantics cause memory corruption and cryptic bugs   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23148] New: Missing invariant symbol with static library when template function declares struct with destructor and invariant that instantiates template with lambda, also main has a lambda   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23148] Missing invariant symbol with static library when template function declares struct with destructor and invariant that instantiates template with lambda, also main has a lambda   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21723] Linker error: two module static library, main compiled inline, invariant that defines a function, type alias, and an alias lambda   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21723] Linker error: two module static library, main compiled inline, invariant that defines a function, type alias, and an alias lambda   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23148] Missing invariant symbol with static library when template function declares struct with destructor and invariant that instantiates template with lambda, also main has a lambda   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 19946] In betterC filling an array with a non-zero value fails for types of size > 1 due to missing _memset16/_memset32/etc.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 15632] Calling delete on scope class should be an error?   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 19272] scope class and const/immutable doesn't work together   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21692] Non-mutable extern(D) scope class instances cannot be created.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 18386] mixin ... isn't a template error when used in new scope   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 18386] mixin ... isn't a template error when used in new scope   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 17448] Move semantics cause memory corruption and cryptic bugs   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 17448] Move semantics cause memory corruption and cryptic bugs   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 17448] Move semantics cause memory corruption and cryptic bugs   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 17448] Move semantics cause memory corruption and cryptic bugs   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 15632] Calling delete on scope class should be an error?   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 17448] Move semantics cause memory corruption and cryptic bugs   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 17448] Move semantics cause memory corruption and cryptic bugs   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 17448] Move semantics cause memory corruption and cryptic bugs   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 17448] Move semantics cause memory corruption and cryptic bugs   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23149] New: doc generator with -i errors writing file for imported module   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23150] New: AA in operator does not work with static if   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23150] AA in operator does not work with static if   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23150] AA in operator does not work with static if   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23142] Scope should not apply to unittests   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 23150] AA in operator does not work with static if   d-bugmail at puremagic.com

Last message date: Tue May 31 14:27:34 UTC 2022
Archived on: Tue May 31 14:28:45 UTC 2022

• Messages sorted by: [ thread ] [ subject ] [ date ]
• More info on this list...