[Issue 16603] [Lexical] comment definition is incorrrect
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
Tue Feb 7 21:45:07 UTC 2023
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16603
kdevel <kdevel at vogtner.de> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |kdevel at vogtner.de
--- Comment #3 from kdevel <kdevel at vogtner.de> ---
(In reply to Kevin from comment #0)
> The c++ spec handles this by describing comments in a non technical manner.
> See [lex.comment] in the spec.
Correct: https://eel.is/c++draft/lex.comment
Another technical mistake one finds in D's definition of StringLiteral:
https://dlang.org/spec/lex.html#string_literals
while the C++ standards carefully define what can be inside of the quotation
marks (s-chars)
https://eel.is/c++draft/lex.string
--
More information about the Digitalmars-d-bugs
mailing list