[Issue 16603] [Lexical] comment definition is incorrrect

d-bugmail at puremagic.com d-bugmail at puremagic.com
Tue Feb 7 21:45:07 UTC 2023


https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16603

kdevel <kdevel at vogtner.de> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |kdevel at vogtner.de

--- Comment #3 from kdevel <kdevel at vogtner.de> ---
(In reply to Kevin from comment #0)

> The c++ spec handles this by describing comments in a non technical manner.
> See  [lex.comment] in the spec.

Correct: https://eel.is/c++draft/lex.comment

Another technical mistake one finds in D's definition of StringLiteral:

https://dlang.org/spec/lex.html#string_literals

while the C++ standards carefully define what can be inside of the quotation
marks (s-chars)

https://eel.is/c++draft/lex.string

--


More information about the Digitalmars-d-bugs mailing list