[Issue 24250] New: Recognize immediate indexing of array literal to prevent GC allocation
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
Sun Nov 19 16:23:02 UTC 2023
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24250
Issue ID: 24250
Summary: Recognize immediate indexing of array literal to
prevent GC allocation
Product: D
Version: D2
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P1
Component: dmd
Assignee: nobody at puremagic.com
Reporter: johanengelen at weka.io
Testcase:
```
enum int[3] masks = [1, 2, 3];
int foo(int a) @nogc {
return masks[a];
}
int foo2(int a) @nogc {
int[3] m = [1, 2, 3];
return m[a];
}
int foo3(int a) @nogc {
return (cast(int[3])[1, 2, 3])[a];
}
int foo4(int a) @nogc {
return [1, 2, 3][a]; // <-- Error
}
```
Compilation error:
`Error: array literal in `@nogc` function `example.foo4` may cause a GC
allocation`
I think this is correct, because the spec says that an array literal is a
dynamic array (https://dlang.org/spec/expression.html#array_literals).
However, it would be nice if the pattern in foo4 is recognized and turned into
foo3 (immediate indexing of array, thus the array does not have to be dynamic),
and no GC allocation is used in foo4.
This does lead to more stack usage in foo4, so there should be an array size
limit for this pattern. But note that foo (with enum) suffers from the same
problem, without clear visibility. (in foo2 and foo3 the potentially large
stack usage is more obvious to the programmer)
--
More information about the Digitalmars-d-bugs
mailing list